2010UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)Requires access

Mind the Gaps: Engineering Education and Practice

James Trevelyan

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

Efforts to reform engineering education by improving the relevance of learning for engineering practice have not yet been very successful. Analysis of published literature demonstrates that engineering education is predominantly based on a model of engineering practice represented by technical problem-solving and design. However, this model cannot explain many observations of engineering practice like the amount of time that engineers interact with other people. This paper presents a description of engineering practice based on detailed observations of engineers. The new description sees engineering as a human performance that relies on distributed expertise. The paper briefly discusses how changes in pedagogy, assessment and accreditation are needed to close the gap between engineering education and practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Efforts to reform engineering education by improving the relevance of learning for engineering practice have not yet been very successful. Analysis of published literature demonstrates that engineering education is predominantly based on a model of engineering practice represented by technical problem-solving and design. However, this model cannot explain many observations of engineering practice like the amount of time that engineers interact with other people. This paper presents a description of engineering practice based on detailed observations of engineers. The new description sees engineering as a human performance that relies on distributed expertise. The paper briefly discusses how changes in pedagogy, assessment and accreditation are needed to close the gap between engineering education and practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Efforts to reform engineering education by improving the relevance of learning for engineering practice have not yet been very successful. Analysis of published literature demonstrates that engineering education is predominantly based on a model of engineering practice represented by technical problem-solving and design. However, this model cannot explain many observations of engineering practice like the amount of time that engineers interact with other people. This paper presents a description of engineering practice based on detailed observations of engineers. The new description sees engineering as a human performance that relies on distributed expertise. The paper briefly discusses how changes in pedagogy, assessment and accreditation are needed to close the gap between engineering education and practice.

Key concepts: Accreditation, Engineering education, Health systems engineering, Relevance (law), Engineering ethics, Engineering, Biological systems engineering, Engineering management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mind the Gaps: Engineering Education and Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens