2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Thiopental vs Propofol

Mohammad-Hadi Safaee, Abdolali Sepidkar, Hamıd Reza Eftekharıan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background/Aim: Hemodynamic variations are inevitable during induction of anesthetic drugs. The present study, investigates the hemodynamic variations of two different drugs used for induction; Thiopental vs. Propofol. Materials and Methods: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, from June 2003 to November 2004, 120 (ASA I and II) patients scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients were premedicated with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 g/kg). Anesthesia was induced with either thiopental 5 mg/kg (group T) or propofol 2 mg/kg (group P). Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) and anesthesia was maintained with halothane 1%, nitrous oxide (67%) in O2. Hemodynamic variable (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were measured non-invasively in three periods: before drug administration, immediately after injection, prior to intubation, and finally immediately after intubation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background/Aim: Hemodynamic variations are inevitable during induction of anesthetic drugs. The present study, investigates the hemodynamic variations of two different drugs used for induction; Thiopental vs. Propofol. Materials and Methods: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, from June 2003 to November 2004, 120 (ASA I and II) patients scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients were premedicated with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 g/kg). Anesthesia was induced with either thiopental 5 mg/kg (group T) or propofol 2 mg/kg (group P). Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) and anesthesia was maintained with halothane 1%, nitrous oxide (67%) in O2. Hemodynamic variable (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were measured non-invasively in three periods: before drug administration, immediately after injection, prior to intubation, and finally immediately after intubation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background/Aim: Hemodynamic variations are inevitable during induction of anesthetic drugs. The present study, investigates the hemodynamic variations of two different drugs used for induction; Thiopental vs. Propofol. Materials and Methods: In a prospective randomized double-blind study, from June 2003 to November 2004, 120 (ASA I and II) patients scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly divided into two equal groups. Patients were premedicated with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 g/kg). Anesthesia was induced with either thiopental 5 mg/kg (group T) or propofol 2 mg/kg (group P). Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) and anesthesia was maintained with halothane 1%, nitrous oxide (67%) in O2. Hemodynamic variable (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and heart rate) were measured non-invasively in three periods: before drug administration, immediately after injection, prior to intubation, and finally immediately after intubation.

Key concepts: Propofol, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Medicine, Hemodynamics, Midazolam, Blood pressure, Intubation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thiopental vs Propofol — Research Paper | ScholarLens