2001Unpublished venueRequires access

Determination of Organic Acids in White Wines by RP-HPLC

Mira Kordi, Veronika Abram, Milica Ka, Stanka Ferjan

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

Summary The chromatographic conditions for the optimal separation of tartaric, malic and citric acids on a LiChrosorb RP-18 column (10 m, 25 cm x 4.0 mm i.d.) at 210 nm were determined. The optimized RP-HPLC method (mobile phase: c(H3PO4 )=6 10 –3 mol/L, pH = 2.1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min) was validated. Calibration curves were linear for all three acids in the concentration range tested; r 2 was better than 0.999. RSDs for tartaric and malic acids were within 2 %, and for citric acid 10.4 %. The average relative error for tartaric acid was 3.2 %, for malic acid 2.5 % and for citric acid 6.0 %. Ethanol caused an insignificant negative response at tR = 5.69 min, whereas glucose and fructose eluted in the void volume. According to the validation results, and from analysis of wine samples, the described HPLC method was found adequate for routine determination of tartaric and malic acids and to some extent also of citric acid in dry, semi-dry, semi-sweet and sweet white wines.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary The chromatographic conditions for the optimal separation of tartaric, malic and citric acids on a LiChrosorb RP-18 column (10 m, 25 cm x 4.0 mm i.d.) at 210 nm were determined. The optimized RP-HPLC method (mobile phase: c(H3PO4 )=6 10 –3 mol/L, pH = 2.1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min) was validated. Calibration curves were linear for all three acids in the concentration range tested; r 2 was better than 0.999. RSDs for tartaric and malic acids were within 2 %, and for citric acid 10.4 %. The average relative error for tartaric acid was 3.2 %, for malic acid 2.5 % and for citric acid 6.0 %. Ethanol caused an insignificant negative response at tR = 5.69 min, whereas glucose and fructose eluted in the void volume. According to the validation results, and from analysis of wine samples, the described HPLC method was found adequate for routine determination of tartaric and malic acids and to some extent also of citric acid in dry, semi-dry, semi-sweet and sweet white wines.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary The chromatographic conditions for the optimal separation of tartaric, malic and citric acids on a LiChrosorb RP-18 column (10 m, 25 cm x 4.0 mm i.d.) at 210 nm were determined. The optimized RP-HPLC method (mobile phase: c(H3PO4 )=6 10 –3 mol/L, pH = 2.1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min) was validated. Calibration curves were linear for all three acids in the concentration range tested; r 2 was better than 0.999. RSDs for tartaric and malic acids were within 2 %, and for citric acid 10.4 %. The average relative error for tartaric acid was 3.2 %, for malic acid 2.5 % and for citric acid 6.0 %. Ethanol caused an insignificant negative response at tR = 5.69 min, whereas glucose and fructose eluted in the void volume. According to the validation results, and from analysis of wine samples, the described HPLC method was found adequate for routine determination of tartaric and malic acids and to some extent also of citric acid in dry, semi-dry, semi-sweet and sweet white wines.

Key concepts: Tartaric acid, Malic acid, Citric acid, Chemistry, Chromatography, High-performance liquid chromatography, Elution, Wine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of Organic Acids in White Wines by RP-HPLC — Research Paper | ScholarLens