Determination of Organic Acids in White Wines by RP-HPLC
Mira Kordi, Veronika Abram, Milica Ka, Stanka Ferjan
Abstract
Mira Kordi, Veronika Abram, Milica Ka, Stanka Ferjan
Abstract
Summary The chromatographic conditions for the optimal separation of tartaric, malic and citric acids on a LiChrosorb RP-18 column (10 m, 25 cm x 4.0 mm i.d.) at 210 nm were determined. The optimized RP-HPLC method (mobile phase: c(H3PO4 )=6 10 –3 mol/L, pH = 2.1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min) was validated. Calibration curves were linear for all three acids in the concentration range tested; r 2 was better than 0.999. RSDs for tartaric and malic acids were within 2 %, and for citric acid 10.4 %. The average relative error for tartaric acid was 3.2 %, for malic acid 2.5 % and for citric acid 6.0 %. Ethanol caused an insignificant negative response at tR = 5.69 min, whereas glucose and fructose eluted in the void volume. According to the validation results, and from analysis of wine samples, the described HPLC method was found adequate for routine determination of tartaric and malic acids and to some extent also of citric acid in dry, semi-dry, semi-sweet and sweet white wines.
OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary The chromatographic conditions for the optimal separation of tartaric, malic and citric acids on a LiChrosorb RP-18 column (10 m, 25 cm x 4.0 mm i.d.) at 210 nm were determined. The optimized RP-HPLC method (mobile phase: c(H3PO4 )=6 10 –3 mol/L, pH = 2.1, flow rate 1.0 mL/min) was validated. Calibration curves were linear for all three acids in the concentration range tested; r 2 was better than 0.999. RSDs for tartaric and malic acids were within 2 %, and for citric acid 10.4 %. The average relative error for tartaric acid was 3.2 %, for malic acid 2.5 % and for citric acid 6.0 %. Ethanol caused an insignificant negative response at tR = 5.69 min, whereas glucose and fructose eluted in the void volume. According to the validation results, and from analysis of wine samples, the described HPLC method was found adequate for routine determination of tartaric and malic acids and to some extent also of citric acid in dry, semi-dry, semi-sweet and sweet white wines.
Key concepts: Tartaric acid, Malic acid, Citric acid, Chemistry, Chromatography, High-performance liquid chromatography, Elution, Wine