Antimicrobial Activity and Spectrum of a Seachaid Pharmaceuticals Investigational Compound (SP2078) Tested against Gram-positive Pathogens
Re Mendes, Pr Rhomberg, Ml Konrardy, Rn Jones
Abstract
Re Mendes, Pr Rhomberg, Ml Konrardy, Rn Jones
Abstract
• SP2078 inhibited all MRSA and MSSA strains at ≤0.12 µg/mL (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.06 µg/mL), and exhibited MIC 50 results four- to eight-fold lower than the direct comparators daptomycin (MIC 50 , 0.25 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL; Table 1). • Similarly, all hVISA and VISA strains were inhibited by SP2078 at ≤0.12 µg/mL (MIC 50 values of 0.06 and 0.12 µg/mL, respectively; Table 1). SP2078 displayed MIC 50 values eight-fold lower than daptomycin (MIC 50 , 0.5-1 µg/mL) and 16- to 64-fold lower than vancomycin (MIC 50 , 1-4 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50 , 2-8 µg/mL) when tested against hVISA and VISA, respectively. • Higher MIC values were observed for SP2078 when tested against VRSA strains (MIC 50 , 2 µg/mL), while daptomycin remained in vitro active (MIC 50 , 0.25 µg/mL; Table 1). • SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was eight-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL), and 32- to 64-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50/90 , 2/4 µg/mL) tested against S. epidermidis (Table 1). • Overall, the SP2078 compound exhibited higher MIC results (MIC 50/90 , 8/8 µg/mL) when tested against vancomycin-resistant VanA-type E. faecalis (Table 2); while daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL) and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) remained very active. • When tested against vancomycin-resistant VanB-type E. faecalis, SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.12 µg/mL) demonstrated in vitro activity comparable to the wildtype vancomycin-susceptible control strains (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL; Table 2). • SP2078 was active when tested against vancomycin-susceptible (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.03 µg/mL) and -resistant (VanB) E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.015/0.03 µg/mL; Table 3). However, SP2078 was less active against vancomycin-resistant (VanA) E. faecium strains (MIC 50/90 , 4/8 µg/mL). • Enterococcal isolates intrinsically harboring the vanC gene were very susceptible to SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.25 µg/mL; Table 4). In addition, teicoplanin and daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL for both) showed MIC 50 values 16-fold higher than SP2078, whereas the vancomycin MIC 50 value obtained (MIC 50/90 , 4/4 µg/mL) was 64-fold higher than SP2078. • SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was four-fold more potent than teicoplanin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) and daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL), and eight-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) when tested against β-hemolytic streptococci (Table 5).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
• SP2078 inhibited all MRSA and MSSA strains at ≤0.12 µg/mL (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.06 µg/mL), and exhibited MIC 50 results four- to eight-fold lower than the direct comparators daptomycin (MIC 50 , 0.25 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50 , 0.5 µg/mL; Table 1). • Similarly, all hVISA and VISA strains were inhibited by SP2078 at ≤0.12 µg/mL (MIC 50 values of 0.06 and 0.12 µg/mL, respectively; Table 1). SP2078 displayed MIC 50 values eight-fold lower than daptomycin (MIC 50 , 0.5-1 µg/mL) and 16- to 64-fold lower than vancomycin (MIC 50 , 1-4 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50 , 2-8 µg/mL) when tested against hVISA and VISA, respectively. • Higher MIC values were observed for SP2078 when tested against VRSA strains (MIC 50 , 2 µg/mL), while daptomycin remained in vitro active (MIC 50 , 0.25 µg/mL; Table 1). • SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was eight-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL), and 32- to 64-fold more potent than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL) and teicoplanin (MIC 50/90 , 2/4 µg/mL) tested against S. epidermidis (Table 1). • Overall, the SP2078 compound exhibited higher MIC results (MIC 50/90 , 8/8 µg/mL) when tested against vancomycin-resistant VanA-type E. faecalis (Table 2); while daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL) and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) remained very active. • When tested against vancomycin-resistant VanB-type E. faecalis, SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.12 µg/mL) demonstrated in vitro activity comparable to the wildtype vancomycin-susceptible control strains (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL; Table 2). • SP2078 was active when tested against vancomycin-susceptible (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.03 µg/mL) and -resistant (VanB) E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.015/0.03 µg/mL; Table 3). However, SP2078 was less active against vancomycin-resistant (VanA) E. faecium strains (MIC 50/90 , 4/8 µg/mL). • Enterococcal isolates intrinsically harboring the vanC gene were very susceptible to SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.25 µg/mL; Table 4). In addition, teicoplanin and daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL for both) showed MIC 50 values 16-fold higher than SP2078, whereas the vancomycin MIC 50 value obtained (MIC 50/90 , 4/4 µg/mL) was 64-fold higher than SP2078. • SP2078 (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was four-fold more potent than teicoplanin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) and daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL), and eight-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) when tested against β-hemolytic streptococci (Table 5).
Key concepts: Daptomycin, Teicoplanin, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Microbiology, Vancomycin, Antimicrobial, Chemistry, Medicine