2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Update on Telavancin Activity Tested Against a Global Collection of Gram-positive Pathogens (2010)

Rodrigo Elisandro Mendes, Helio Silva Sader, David J. Farrell, Ronald N. Jones

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Telavancin-susceptible breakpoints for S. aureus (≤1 µg/mL), vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (≤1 µg/mL), BHS ( ≤0.12 µg/mL), and VGS (≤0.12 µg/mL) were those approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2 • Enterococcal isolates were clustered according to glycopeptide susceptibility. The VanA phenotype was characterized by non-susceptibility to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL) and teicoplanin ( ≥16 µg/mL), while isolates with a VanB phenotype were those nonsusceptible to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL), but susceptible to teicoplanin ( ≤8 µg/mL), according to the CLSI interpretive criteria. 4 RESULTS • Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 40.4% and 74.0% of S. aureus and CoNS, respectively. Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) exhibited equivalent potencies when tested against S. aureus and CoNS and inhibited all isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, regardless of oxacillin resistance ( Table 1 ). • When tested against MRSA, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against a worldwide collection of CoNS, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 µg/mL) and vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) inhibited 97.8% of clinical isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, including 6 VanB-type strains. All 32 E. faecalis exhibiting telavancin MIC at ≥2 µg/mL displayed a VanA phenotype ( Table 1 ). • When tested against all E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) demonstrated MIC 90 values 2- to 4-fold lower than ampicillin (MIC 50/90 , ≤1/2 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • Telavancin tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 4- to 8-fold more active when compared with vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • When tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 8- to 16-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and 16- to 32-fold more active than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 2/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • VanB-type E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.5 µg/mL) exhibited higher telavancin MIC values when compared with vancomycin-susceptible strains (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ), yet telavancin inhibited all strains at ≤1 µg/mL. VanA-type E. faecium showed decreased susceptibility to telavancin (MI C50/90 , 2/>2 µg/mL). • Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , ≤0.015/0.03 µg/mL) was very potent against S. pneumoniae isolates, from which 0.6% and 22.4% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin-resistant using the CLSI criteria (parenteral [ ≥8 µg/mL] and oral [ ≥2 µg/mL] therapy breakpoints, respectively; Table 2 ). • Telavancin MIC 50 results when tested against BHS serogroup B (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) were slightly higher (2-fold) than those noted against serogroup A (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup C (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup F (MIC 50 , 0.03 µg/mL), and serogroup G (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • Among VGS, 5.4% of strains were fully resistant to penicillin ( Table 2 ). Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was 2- to 16-fold more potent than penicillin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/1 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) when tested against VGS. Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of telavancin tested against a worldwide collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates (2010) Organism/groups MIC ( µg/mL) Number (cumulative %) of isolates inhibited at each telavancin MIC ( µg/mL) of:

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Telavancin-susceptible breakpoints for S. aureus (≤1 µg/mL), vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (≤1 µg/mL), BHS ( ≤0.12 µg/mL), and VGS (≤0.12 µg/mL) were those approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2 • Enterococcal isolates were clustered according to glycopeptide susceptibility. The VanA phenotype was characterized by non-susceptibility to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL) and teicoplanin ( ≥16 µg/mL), while isolates with a VanB phenotype were those nonsusceptible to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL), but susceptible to teicoplanin ( ≤8 µg/mL), according to the CLSI interpretive criteria. 4 RESULTS • Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 40.4% and 74.0% of S. aureus and CoNS, respectively. Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) exhibited equivalent potencies when tested against S. aureus and CoNS and inhibited all isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, regardless of oxacillin resistance ( Table 1 ). • When tested against MRSA, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against a worldwide collection of CoNS, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 µg/mL) and vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) inhibited 97.8% of clinical isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, including 6 VanB-type strains. All 32 E. faecalis exhibiting telavancin MIC at ≥2 µg/mL displayed a VanA phenotype ( Table 1 ). • When tested against all E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) demonstrated MIC 90 values 2- to 4-fold lower than ampicillin (MIC 50/90 , ≤1/2 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • Telavancin tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 4- to 8-fold more active when compared with vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • When tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 8- to 16-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and 16- to 32-fold more active than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 2/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • VanB-type E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.5 µg/mL) exhibited higher telavancin MIC values when compared with vancomycin-susceptible strains (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ), yet telavancin inhibited all strains at ≤1 µg/mL. VanA-type E. faecium showed decreased susceptibility to telavancin (MI C50/90 , 2/>2 µg/mL). • Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , ≤0.015/0.03 µg/mL) was very potent against S. pneumoniae isolates, from which 0.6% and 22.4% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin-resistant using the CLSI criteria (parenteral [ ≥8 µg/mL] and oral [ ≥2 µg/mL] therapy breakpoints, respectively; Table 2 ). • Telavancin MIC 50 results when tested against BHS serogroup B (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) were slightly higher (2-fold) than those noted against serogroup A (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup C (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup F (MIC 50 , 0.03 µg/mL), and serogroup G (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • Among VGS, 5.4% of strains were fully resistant to penicillin ( Table 2 ). Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was 2- to 16-fold more potent than penicillin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/1 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) when tested against VGS. Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of telavancin tested against a worldwide collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates (2010) Organism/groups MIC ( µg/mL) Number (cumulative %) of isolates inhibited at each telavancin MIC ( µg/mL) of:

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Telavancin-susceptible breakpoints for S. aureus (≤1 µg/mL), vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (≤1 µg/mL), BHS ( ≤0.12 µg/mL), and VGS (≤0.12 µg/mL) were those approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2 • Enterococcal isolates were clustered according to glycopeptide susceptibility. The VanA phenotype was characterized by non-susceptibility to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL) and teicoplanin ( ≥16 µg/mL), while isolates with a VanB phenotype were those nonsusceptible to vancomycin ( ≥8 µg/mL), but susceptible to teicoplanin ( ≤8 µg/mL), according to the CLSI interpretive criteria. 4 RESULTS • Resistance to oxacillin was observed in 40.4% and 74.0% of S. aureus and CoNS, respectively. Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) exhibited equivalent potencies when tested against S. aureus and CoNS and inhibited all isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, regardless of oxacillin resistance ( Table 1 ). • When tested against MRSA, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against a worldwide collection of CoNS, telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.25 µg/mL) was 2-fold more potent than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL) and 4- to 8-fold more active than linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 µg/mL) and vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • When tested against E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) inhibited 97.8% of clinical isolates at ≤1 µg/mL, including 6 VanB-type strains. All 32 E. faecalis exhibiting telavancin MIC at ≥2 µg/mL displayed a VanA phenotype ( Table 1 ). • When tested against all E. faecalis , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL) demonstrated MIC 90 values 2- to 4-fold lower than ampicillin (MIC 50/90 , ≤1/2 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • Telavancin tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 4- to 8-fold more active when compared with vancomycin-susceptible E. faecalis (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • When tested against vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium , telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) was 8- to 16-fold more active than vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) and 16- to 32-fold more active than daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 2/2 µg/mL; Table 2 ). • VanB-type E. faecium (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.5 µg/mL) exhibited higher telavancin MIC values when compared with vancomycin-susceptible strains (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ), yet telavancin inhibited all strains at ≤1 µg/mL. VanA-type E. faecium showed decreased susceptibility to telavancin (MI C50/90 , 2/>2 µg/mL). • Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , ≤0.015/0.03 µg/mL) was very potent against S. pneumoniae isolates, from which 0.6% and 22.4% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin-resistant using the CLSI criteria (parenteral [ ≥8 µg/mL] and oral [ ≥2 µg/mL] therapy breakpoints, respectively; Table 2 ). • Telavancin MIC 50 results when tested against BHS serogroup B (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/0.12 µg/mL) were slightly higher (2-fold) than those noted against serogroup A (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup C (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL), serogroup F (MIC 50 , 0.03 µg/mL), and serogroup G (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.12 µg/mL; Table 1 ). • Among VGS, 5.4% of strains were fully resistant to penicillin ( Table 2 ). Telavancin (MIC 50/90 , 0.03/0.06 µg/mL) was 2- to 16-fold more potent than penicillin (MIC 50/90 , 0.06/1 µg/mL), daptomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.25/0.5 µg/mL), vancomycin (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/0.5 µg/mL), and linezolid (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 µg/mL) when tested against VGS. Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of telavancin tested against a worldwide collection of Gram-positive clinical isolates (2010) Organism/groups MIC ( µg/mL) Number (cumulative %) of isolates inhibited at each telavancin MIC ( µg/mL) of:

Key concepts: Teicoplanin, Daptomycin, Linezolid, Vancomycin, Microbiology, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Staphylococcus aureus, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Update on Telavancin Activity Tested Against a Global Collection of Gram-positive Pathogens (2010) — Research Paper | ScholarLens