Comparison of Cefuroxime and Cefazolin: Prophylaxis Against Infection in Arterial Reconstructive Surgery
Edgar Borrero, DAVID M. ROSENTHAL
Abstract
Edgar Borrero, DAVID M. ROSENTHAL
Abstract
A prospective randomized study of 55 patients receiving prophylaxis with cefuroxime versus 55 patients receiving prophylaxis with cefazolin against post operative wound infection was conducted from August 1986, through January 1988. Two of the cefuroxime-treated patients and 8 of the cefazolin-treated patients developed postoperative wound infections (p<0.05). There were no graft infections. Cefuroxime represents an excellent alternative to the presently used cefazolin as prophylaxis against postoperative wound infections in arterial recon structive surgery.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A prospective randomized study of 55 patients receiving prophylaxis with cefuroxime versus 55 patients receiving prophylaxis with cefazolin against post operative wound infection was conducted from August 1986, through January 1988. Two of the cefuroxime-treated patients and 8 of the cefazolin-treated patients developed postoperative wound infections (p<0.05). There were no graft infections. Cefuroxime represents an excellent alternative to the presently used cefazolin as prophylaxis against postoperative wound infections in arterial recon structive surgery.
Key concepts: Cefazolin, Medicine, Cefuroxime, Surgery, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Anesthesia, Antibiotics, Microbiology