Experimental Evaluation of Predistortion Techniques for High-Power Amplifier
Dongliang Huang, Henry Leung, Xinping Huang
Abstract
Dongliang Huang, Henry Leung, Xinping Huang
Abstract
Modern communication systems suffer from the nonnegligible distortion caused by the inherent nonlinearity of high-power amplifiers (HPAs). As such, many methods have been proposed to mitigate this nonlinear effect. However, their performances are seldom compared, and their practicalities are rarely evaluated. In this paper, experimental setups to investigate two popular types of HPA systems have been developed: 1) the traveling wave tube amplifiers and 2) the solid-state power amplifiers. Experimental data were collected to evaluate four predistortion compensation techniques including the polynomial, rational function (RF), neural networks, and neurofuzzy methods. Using different performance measures, the experimental evaluation shows that the neuro approaches have a higher accuracy for some measures, but the tradeoff is a much higher computation cost. Overall speaking, the RF method seems to have the best balance between the compensation accuracy and complexity among the methods.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Modern communication systems suffer from the nonnegligible distortion caused by the inherent nonlinearity of high-power amplifiers (HPAs). As such, many methods have been proposed to mitigate this nonlinear effect. However, their performances are seldom compared, and their practicalities are rarely evaluated. In this paper, experimental setups to investigate two popular types of HPA systems have been developed: 1) the traveling wave tube amplifiers and 2) the solid-state power amplifiers. Experimental data were collected to evaluate four predistortion compensation techniques including the polynomial, rational function (RF), neural networks, and neurofuzzy methods. Using different performance measures, the experimental evaluation shows that the neuro approaches have a higher accuracy for some measures, but the tradeoff is a much higher computation cost. Overall speaking, the RF method seems to have the best balance between the compensation accuracy and complexity among the methods.
Key concepts: Predistortion, Amplifier, Nonlinear distortion, Electronic engineering, Computer science, Distortion (music), Compensation (psychology), Power (physics)