2007CORROSIONRequires access

A Galvanic Sensor for Monitoring the Corrosion Damage of Buried Pipelines: Part 3—Correlation of Probe Current to Cathodic Protection and Stray Current

Yong-Suk Choi, J. G. Kim, J-Y. Koo

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In order to develop a new corrosion sensor for monitoring the status of cathodic protection of buried pipelines, the correlation of sensor output to protection abilities (protection potential and current) was evaluated using two types of laboratory tests. The galvanic sensor uses the well-known principle of galvanic corrosion and consists of two dissimilar metals (acting as the anode and cathode) installed in the soil near the pipeline. In this paper, a copper-pipeline steel (Cu-CS) probe was used. The cathodic protection status of the pipeline was simulated by a galvanostatic test. The galvanic current density was measured using a zero-resistance ammeter for the Cu-CS probe with the anode (CS) either connected or disconnected to the pipeline. The results showed a good correlation between the protection potential/current of the pipeline and the sensor output. Especially when the protection current was induced to the pipeline, the measured sensor current was negative (–), whereas when the stray current was removed from the pipeline, the measured sensor current was positive (+). This indicates that the direction of sensor current reflects the status of the pipeline with cathodic protection or stray current corrosion, confirming that the Cu-CS galvanic probe is an effective tool for monitoring the effectiveness of cathodic protection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to develop a new corrosion sensor for monitoring the status of cathodic protection of buried pipelines, the correlation of sensor output to protection abilities (protection potential and current) was evaluated using two types of laboratory tests. The galvanic sensor uses the well-known principle of galvanic corrosion and consists of two dissimilar metals (acting as the anode and cathode) installed in the soil near the pipeline. In this paper, a copper-pipeline steel (Cu-CS) probe was used. The cathodic protection status of the pipeline was simulated by a galvanostatic test. The galvanic current density was measured using a zero-resistance ammeter for the Cu-CS probe with the anode (CS) either connected or disconnected to the pipeline. The results showed a good correlation between the protection potential/current of the pipeline and the sensor output. Especially when the protection current was induced to the pipeline, the measured sensor current was negative (–), whereas when the stray current was removed from the pipeline, the measured sensor current was positive (+). This indicates that the direction of sensor current reflects the status of the pipeline with cathodic protection or stray current corrosion, confirming that the Cu-CS galvanic probe is an effective tool for monitoring the effectiveness of cathodic protection.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to develop a new corrosion sensor for monitoring the status of cathodic protection of buried pipelines, the correlation of sensor output to protection abilities (protection potential and current) was evaluated using two types of laboratory tests. The galvanic sensor uses the well-known principle of galvanic corrosion and consists of two dissimilar metals (acting as the anode and cathode) installed in the soil near the pipeline. In this paper, a copper-pipeline steel (Cu-CS) probe was used. The cathodic protection status of the pipeline was simulated by a galvanostatic test. The galvanic current density was measured using a zero-resistance ammeter for the Cu-CS probe with the anode (CS) either connected or disconnected to the pipeline. The results showed a good correlation between the protection potential/current of the pipeline and the sensor output. Especially when the protection current was induced to the pipeline, the measured sensor current was negative (–), whereas when the stray current was removed from the pipeline, the measured sensor current was positive (+). This indicates that the direction of sensor current reflects the status of the pipeline with cathodic protection or stray current corrosion, confirming that the Cu-CS galvanic probe is an effective tool for monitoring the effectiveness of cathodic protection.

Key concepts: Cathodic protection, Stray voltage, Galvanic cell, Corrosion, Current (fluid), Galvanic anode, Pipeline transport, Anode

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Galvanic Sensor for Monitoring the Corrosion Damage of Buried Pipelines: Part 3—Correlation of Probe Current to Cathodic Protection and Stray Current — Research Paper | ScholarLens