Strengths and Limitations of the Occupational Therapy Model Curriculum Guide as Illustrated in a Comprehensive Curriculum Revision Process
Barbara R. Hooper, Karen E Atler, Wendy H. Wood
Abstract
Barbara R. Hooper, Karen E Atler, Wendy H. Wood
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Model Curriculum was developed to guide curriculum design initiatives in occupational therapy. No data exist describing the Model Curriculum guide in an actual curriculum design process. This paper offers initial descriptive data on the strengths and limitations of the Model Curriculum guide as illustrated in a comprehensive curriculum revision process. The strengths of the Model Curriculum guide included: (1) it represented curriculum as a holistic academic plan and curriculum design as a series of decision points around interrelated elements, (2) it provided an orientation to the vocabulary and process of inductive curriculum design, (3) it provided a general process for undertaking curriculum revision work that was data-driven, and (4) the guide helped raise fundamental questions about the nature of curriculum and learning. Yet, each of these functions was also limited. Limitations are described and recommended revisions to the Model Curriculum guide are offered.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ABSTRACT The Model Curriculum was developed to guide curriculum design initiatives in occupational therapy. No data exist describing the Model Curriculum guide in an actual curriculum design process. This paper offers initial descriptive data on the strengths and limitations of the Model Curriculum guide as illustrated in a comprehensive curriculum revision process. The strengths of the Model Curriculum guide included: (1) it represented curriculum as a holistic academic plan and curriculum design as a series of decision points around interrelated elements, (2) it provided an orientation to the vocabulary and process of inductive curriculum design, (3) it provided a general process for undertaking curriculum revision work that was data-driven, and (4) the guide helped raise fundamental questions about the nature of curriculum and learning. Yet, each of these functions was also limited. Limitations are described and recommended revisions to the Model Curriculum guide are offered.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Curriculum theory, Emergent curriculum, Curriculum mapping, Understanding by Design, Process (computing), Vocabulary, Computer science