Engagement and Games for Learning
Rachel S. Phillips, Theresa Horstman, Nancy J. Vye, John D. Bransford
Abstract
Rachel S. Phillips, Theresa Horstman, Nancy J. Vye, John D. Bransford
Abstract
Aim. In this article, we argue for an expanded definition and treatment of engagement when studying games for learning. Background. It is common for researchers in the field to collapse behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement into one shared category. We assert that educators and games for learning researchers should examine all types of engagement using multiple methodologies as a means to better understand precisely what students are learning from game play. Method. We present findings from a small ( N = 58) qualitative study that highlights the importance of accounting for behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement when evaluating learning from games. We also discuss methodologies that are successful for this type of evaluation. Results. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for those creating games for learning and for measuring learning gains.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Aim. In this article, we argue for an expanded definition and treatment of engagement when studying games for learning. Background. It is common for researchers in the field to collapse behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement into one shared category. We assert that educators and games for learning researchers should examine all types of engagement using multiple methodologies as a means to better understand precisely what students are learning from game play. Method. We present findings from a small ( N = 58) qualitative study that highlights the importance of accounting for behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement when evaluating learning from games. We also discuss methodologies that are successful for this type of evaluation. Results. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for those creating games for learning and for measuring learning gains.
Key concepts: Psychology, Student engagement, Cognition, Experiential learning, Cognitive psychology, Mathematics education, Neuroscience