1986Sexually Transmitted InfectionsOpen access

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with Treponema pallidum or axial filament of T phagedenis biotype Reiter as antigen: evaluation as screening tests for syphilis.

Roel van Eijk, H E Menke, G J Tideman, E Stolz

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with an ultrasonicate of Treponema pallidum (TP-ELISA) or axial filament of Treponema phagedenis biotype Reiter (AF-ELISA) were developed to detect treponemal antibody. TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were compared with the T pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA), the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) test, and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test for sensitivity and specificity of serodiagnosis of syphilis. A total of 1423 serum samples, 253 from patients with various stages of syphilis, 500 from patients attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic, and 670 from people without syphilis, were investigated. At all stages of syphilis the sensitivity of the TP-ELISA, the AF-ELISA, the TPHA, and the FTA-ABS test did not differ significantly, except that the AF-ELISA was less sensitive than the TPHA (p less than 0.05) for treated syphilis. In primary syphilis, neurosyphilis, and treated syphilis the TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were significantly more sensitive than the VDRL test (p less than 0.05). The specificity of all tests was comparable (p greater than 0.05). The TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA appear to be good alternatives to the TPHA as screening tests for syphilis. Because of the easy availability of a well defined antigen the AF-ELISA seems to be better suited for large scale testing.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with an ultrasonicate of Treponema pallidum (TP-ELISA) or axial filament of Treponema phagedenis biotype Reiter (AF-ELISA) were developed to detect treponemal antibody. TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were compared with the T pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA), the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) test, and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test for sensitivity and specificity of serodiagnosis of syphilis. A total of 1423 serum samples, 253 from patients with various stages of syphilis, 500 from patients attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic, and 670 from people without syphilis, were investigated. At all stages of syphilis the sensitivity of the TP-ELISA, the AF-ELISA, the TPHA, and the FTA-ABS test did not differ significantly, except that the AF-ELISA was less sensitive than the TPHA (p less than 0.05) for treated syphilis. In primary syphilis, neurosyphilis, and treated syphilis the TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were significantly more sensitive than the VDRL test (p less than 0.05). The specificity of all tests was comparable (p greater than 0.05). The TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA appear to be good alternatives to the TPHA as screening tests for syphilis. Because of the easy availability of a well defined antigen the AF-ELISA seems to be better suited for large scale testing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with an ultrasonicate of Treponema pallidum (TP-ELISA) or axial filament of Treponema phagedenis biotype Reiter (AF-ELISA) were developed to detect treponemal antibody. TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were compared with the T pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA), the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed (FTA-ABS) test, and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test for sensitivity and specificity of serodiagnosis of syphilis. A total of 1423 serum samples, 253 from patients with various stages of syphilis, 500 from patients attending a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic, and 670 from people without syphilis, were investigated. At all stages of syphilis the sensitivity of the TP-ELISA, the AF-ELISA, the TPHA, and the FTA-ABS test did not differ significantly, except that the AF-ELISA was less sensitive than the TPHA (p less than 0.05) for treated syphilis. In primary syphilis, neurosyphilis, and treated syphilis the TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA were significantly more sensitive than the VDRL test (p less than 0.05). The specificity of all tests was comparable (p greater than 0.05). The TP-ELISA and AF-ELISA appear to be good alternatives to the TPHA as screening tests for syphilis. Because of the easy availability of a well defined antigen the AF-ELISA seems to be better suited for large scale testing.

Key concepts: Treponema, Syphilis, Medicine, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Sexually transmitted disease, Antigen, Antibody, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays with Treponema pallidum or axial filament of T phagedenis biotype Reiter as antigen: evaluation as screening tests for syphilis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens