Platelet Apheresis with Vivacell BT798 DEA, Haemonetics V-50 and PCS-Plus: Preparation Efficiency and Product Quality Using Identical Donors
Ekkehard Richter, I Pawlow, K.‐P. Krause, G Matthes
Abstract
Ekkehard Richter, I Pawlow, K.‐P. Krause, G Matthes
Abstract
Different platelet apheresis techniques were used for preparing platelet concentrates: the continuous flow method with Vivacell BT 798 DEA, the discontinuous flow method with V-50 of Haemonetics, and their plasmapheresis device PCS-Plus. 20 of our donors underwent all three procedures. All platelet separations led to suitable platelet concentrates of 3 x 10(11) platelets within less than 90 min. However, the contaminating leukocytes reached 2 x 10(8). Due to less intense citrate reactions and a shorter donation time the donor acceptance of the continuous flow method was higher as compared with the discontinuous flow method.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Different platelet apheresis techniques were used for preparing platelet concentrates: the continuous flow method with Vivacell BT 798 DEA, the discontinuous flow method with V-50 of Haemonetics, and their plasmapheresis device PCS-Plus. 20 of our donors underwent all three procedures. All platelet separations led to suitable platelet concentrates of 3 x 10(11) platelets within less than 90 min. However, the contaminating leukocytes reached 2 x 10(8). Due to less intense citrate reactions and a shorter donation time the donor acceptance of the continuous flow method was higher as compared with the discontinuous flow method.
Key concepts: Apheresis, Plasmapheresis, Plateletpheresis, Platelet, Blood donor, Continuous flow, Blood product, Chemistry