1998Practice Periodical on Structural Design and ConstructionRequires access

Determining Schedule Impact: Working Practice

Abdulaziz A. Bubshait, Michael J. Cunningham

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor.

Key concepts: Negotiation, Schedule, Settlement (finance), Scheduling (production processes), Float (project management), Construction industry, Project management, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determining Schedule Impact: Working Practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens