Determining Schedule Impact: Working Practice
Abdulaziz A. Bubshait, Michael J. Cunningham
Abstract
Abdulaziz A. Bubshait, Michael J. Cunningham
Abstract
Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Construction project delays may result from many circumstances. Negotiating a fair and timely damage settlement is beneficial to all parties. Network-based scheduling is an excellent way for negotiating settlement of changes, disputes, and delays throughout the project. In the construction industry, however, there is no single standard and no “accepted” procedure to determine impact of schedule delays. This paper suggests a practice for evaluating schedule impact. The practice allows available float to be shared by both the owner and the contractor.
Key concepts: Negotiation, Schedule, Settlement (finance), Scheduling (production processes), Float (project management), Construction industry, Project management, Business