International Outsourcing Ratio of China Industrial Sectors: How Measurement Matters
Xinjun Lv
Abstract
Xinjun Lv
Abstract
The paper uses three methods estimating material outsourcing ratio and service outsourcing ratio of China's 36 industrial sectors in 1997, 2002 and 2007. Then we investigate the quality of the three methods through the Shift-Share method. This study is useful for related empirical studies on outsourcing. We find that different methods lead to a big difference of outsourcing ratio. The results show an upward trend of China's industrial sector outsourcing ratio during 1997-2007, and the growth rate of service outsourcing is higher than material outsourcing; structural changes have a greater impact on the material outsourcing ratio than the services outsourcing ratio.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The paper uses three methods estimating material outsourcing ratio and service outsourcing ratio of China's 36 industrial sectors in 1997, 2002 and 2007. Then we investigate the quality of the three methods through the Shift-Share method. This study is useful for related empirical studies on outsourcing. We find that different methods lead to a big difference of outsourcing ratio. The results show an upward trend of China's industrial sector outsourcing ratio during 1997-2007, and the growth rate of service outsourcing is higher than material outsourcing; structural changes have a greater impact on the material outsourcing ratio than the services outsourcing ratio.
Key concepts: Outsourcing, China, Knowledge process outsourcing, Business, Tertiary sector of the economy, Industrial organization, Service (business), Empirical research