A comparison of surface metrology techniques
Mike Conroy, J. H. Armstrong
Abstract
Open-access reader
Mike Conroy, J. H. Armstrong
Abstract
Open-access reader
The study of surface metrology is becoming more and more commonplace in industrial and research environments. Because of this expansion there are more and more technologies available for looking at the surface and each has its own applications. Stylus profilometry, white light interferometry and confocal microscopy are common techniques used to measure surface metrology. Strengths and weaknesses of each of the techniques are discussed with examples. The use of scanning probe techniques as metrology tools is also briefly discussed.
OpenAlex reports 72 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The study of surface metrology is becoming more and more commonplace in industrial and research environments. Because of this expansion there are more and more technologies available for looking at the surface and each has its own applications. Stylus profilometry, white light interferometry and confocal microscopy are common techniques used to measure surface metrology. Strengths and weaknesses of each of the techniques are discussed with examples. The use of scanning probe techniques as metrology tools is also briefly discussed.
Key concepts: Metrology, Surface metrology, Stylus, Profilometer, White light interferometry, Interferometry, Dimensional metrology, Optics