Surface roughness measurements of low-scatter mirrors and roughness standards
Karl H. Guenther, Peter G. Wierer, Jean M. Bennett
Abstract
Karl H. Guenther, Peter G. Wierer, Jean M. Bennett
Abstract
The surface roughness of low-scatter mirrors and roughness standards can be measured in various ways: mechanically, optically, and electronoptically. In this paper several useful methods and instruments—total integrated scattering, stylus profilometer, optical heterodyne profilometer, variable angle scatterometer, and electron mirror interference microscope—are presented. Qualitative surface roughness assessment is provided by Nomarski microscopy and transmission electron microscopy of surface replicas. Samples were prepared at Balzers, and their surface roughness was measured at several laboratories using the methods given above. The results of these measurements are compared, and reasons for the differences are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 113 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The surface roughness of low-scatter mirrors and roughness standards can be measured in various ways: mechanically, optically, and electronoptically. In this paper several useful methods and instruments—total integrated scattering, stylus profilometer, optical heterodyne profilometer, variable angle scatterometer, and electron mirror interference microscope—are presented. Qualitative surface roughness assessment is provided by Nomarski microscopy and transmission electron microscopy of surface replicas. Samples were prepared at Balzers, and their surface roughness was measured at several laboratories using the methods given above. The results of these measurements are compared, and reasons for the differences are discussed.
Key concepts: Profilometer, Optics, Stylus, Surface roughness, Materials science, Surface finish, Interference microscopy, Surface metrology