2013Unpublished venueRequires access

The comparative analysis of difference between R&D innovation TFP and integrative TFP in China's high-tech industry

Mingye Ai, Piao Meilan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Based on the panel data of 17 subdivision industries of high-tech industry in China between 1999 and 2011, the paper calculates integrative TFP and R&D innovation TFP respectively and analyzed the causes of the differences between them by the method of Malmquist index of DEA model. The results show that the integrative TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry mostly presents a trend of growth, and the growth mainly results from the joint improvement of both technical efficiency and technical progress. Moreover, the technical efficiency played a negative role on the growth of integrative TFP, the improvement and reduction of TFP has a certain difference between subdivision industries. The R&D innovation TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry in China has been in low efficiency all the time, it is mainly due to appearing a negative growth in technical progress. The reasons to difference are analyzed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on the panel data of 17 subdivision industries of high-tech industry in China between 1999 and 2011, the paper calculates integrative TFP and R&D innovation TFP respectively and analyzed the causes of the differences between them by the method of Malmquist index of DEA model. The results show that the integrative TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry mostly presents a trend of growth, and the growth mainly results from the joint improvement of both technical efficiency and technical progress. Moreover, the technical efficiency played a negative role on the growth of integrative TFP, the improvement and reduction of TFP has a certain difference between subdivision industries. The R&D innovation TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry in China has been in low efficiency all the time, it is mainly due to appearing a negative growth in technical progress. The reasons to difference are analyzed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on the panel data of 17 subdivision industries of high-tech industry in China between 1999 and 2011, the paper calculates integrative TFP and R&D innovation TFP respectively and analyzed the causes of the differences between them by the method of Malmquist index of DEA model. The results show that the integrative TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry mostly presents a trend of growth, and the growth mainly results from the joint improvement of both technical efficiency and technical progress. Moreover, the technical efficiency played a negative role on the growth of integrative TFP, the improvement and reduction of TFP has a certain difference between subdivision industries. The R&D innovation TFP of each subdivision industry of high-tech industry in China has been in low efficiency all the time, it is mainly due to appearing a negative growth in technical progress. The reasons to difference are analyzed.

Key concepts: Total factor productivity, Subdivision, China, High tech, Technical progress, Index (typography), Malmquist index, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The comparative analysis of difference between R&D innovation TFP and integrative TFP in China's high-tech industry — Research Paper | ScholarLens