1993Canadian Foreign Policy JournalRequires access

United Nations peacekeeping and Canadian policy: A reassessment

Henry Wiseman

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

After surveying a number of contemporary United Nations peacekeeping operatio ns the author comes to the conclusion that the traditional principles of consent, impartiality, non‐use of force, standard operating procedures, and rules of engagement have eroded. Training programs for multidimensional political/civilian operations are inadequate. The article concludes that it is not a question of whether the Canadian Forces are properly trained to perform the military functions of peacekeeping. The question is whether there is adequate appreciation of the complexity of the new generation of peacekeeping, of the involvement of military personnel in the politics of negotiation, and the administrative coordination with civilian governmental and non‐governmental personnel who are equally responsible to fulfil their share of a peacekeeping mandate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

After surveying a number of contemporary United Nations peacekeeping operatio ns the author comes to the conclusion that the traditional principles of consent, impartiality, non‐use of force, standard operating procedures, and rules of engagement have eroded. Training programs for multidimensional political/civilian operations are inadequate. The article concludes that it is not a question of whether the Canadian Forces are properly trained to perform the military functions of peacekeeping. The question is whether there is adequate appreciation of the complexity of the new generation of peacekeeping, of the involvement of military personnel in the politics of negotiation, and the administrative coordination with civilian governmental and non‐governmental personnel who are equally responsible to fulfil their share of a peacekeeping mandate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

After surveying a number of contemporary United Nations peacekeeping operatio ns the author comes to the conclusion that the traditional principles of consent, impartiality, non‐use of force, standard operating procedures, and rules of engagement have eroded. Training programs for multidimensional political/civilian operations are inadequate. The article concludes that it is not a question of whether the Canadian Forces are properly trained to perform the military functions of peacekeeping. The question is whether there is adequate appreciation of the complexity of the new generation of peacekeeping, of the involvement of military personnel in the politics of negotiation, and the administrative coordination with civilian governmental and non‐governmental personnel who are equally responsible to fulfil their share of a peacekeeping mandate.

Key concepts: Peacekeeping, Impartiality, Mandate, Negotiation, Political science, Politics, Public administration, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
United Nations peacekeeping and Canadian policy: A reassessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens