1984Academic MedicineRequires access

Effect of three-year and four-year curricula on physiciansʼ attitudes and medical practice

L K Gunzburger, Lu Yang, Judith Tobin

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the study reported here was to identify the differences, if any, between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. Physicians from the four-year curriculum plan indicated they believed they were more adequately taught than those in the subsequent three-year curriculum plan. The training that the former physicians received seemed to provide them with a better basis for being independent. They regarded as desirable a medical practice requiring them to deal with many uncertainties in diagnosis and therapy. Physicians graduating from the medical school when the three-year plan was in effect seemed to have more personal and academic problems, and more of them suggested that various subjects should have been given greater emphasis in the medical school curriculum.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of the study reported here was to identify the differences, if any, between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. Physicians from the four-year curriculum plan indicated they believed they were more adequately taught than those in the subsequent three-year curriculum plan. The training that the former physicians received seemed to provide them with a better basis for being independent. They regarded as desirable a medical practice requiring them to deal with many uncertainties in diagnosis and therapy. Physicians graduating from the medical school when the three-year plan was in effect seemed to have more personal and academic problems, and more of them suggested that various subjects should have been given greater emphasis in the medical school curriculum.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of the study reported here was to identify the differences, if any, between graduates who were in different curricula at Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. Physicians from the four-year curriculum plan indicated they believed they were more adequately taught than those in the subsequent three-year curriculum plan. The training that the former physicians received seemed to provide them with a better basis for being independent. They regarded as desirable a medical practice requiring them to deal with many uncertainties in diagnosis and therapy. Physicians graduating from the medical school when the three-year plan was in effect seemed to have more personal and academic problems, and more of them suggested that various subjects should have been given greater emphasis in the medical school curriculum.

Key concepts: Curriculum, Medical education, Plan (archaeology), Medical school, Medical practice, Medicine, Academic year, Family medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of three-year and four-year curricula on physiciansʼ attitudes and medical practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens