1987•Journal of the Optical Society of America ARequires access

Error analysis of circular polarizer–analyzer systems for phase retardation measurements

Nikiforos G. Theofanous

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

The accuracy and the related advantages of circular polarizer-sample-circular analyzer systems used for measuring optical phase retardations are considered, particularly in relation to their property of having (ideally) a transmission independent of the azimuths of their components. An analysis is presented of errors resulting from retardation imperfections and azimuthal misalignments in practical systems. Important precision benefits are obtained with circular polarization systems having parallel polarizer and analyzer axes when compared with results obtained with conventional linear polarizer-sample-linear analyzer or Senarmont-type polarizer-sample-compensator-analyzer systems. The effects of temperature and wavelength variations are additionally examined and found to be comparatively weak. A discussion on the virtues and drawbacks of the above systems concludes the paper.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The accuracy and the related advantages of circular polarizer-sample-circular analyzer systems used for measuring optical phase retardations are considered, particularly in relation to their property of having (ideally) a transmission independent of the azimuths of their components. An analysis is presented of errors resulting from retardation imperfections and azimuthal misalignments in practical systems. Important precision benefits are obtained with circular polarization systems having parallel polarizer and analyzer axes when compared with results obtained with conventional linear polarizer-sample-linear analyzer or Senarmont-type polarizer-sample-compensator-analyzer systems. The effects of temperature and wavelength variations are additionally examined and found to be comparatively weak. A discussion on the virtues and drawbacks of the above systems concludes the paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The accuracy and the related advantages of circular polarizer-sample-circular analyzer systems used for measuring optical phase retardations are considered, particularly in relation to their property of having (ideally) a transmission independent of the azimuths of their components. An analysis is presented of errors resulting from retardation imperfections and azimuthal misalignments in practical systems. Important precision benefits are obtained with circular polarization systems having parallel polarizer and analyzer axes when compared with results obtained with conventional linear polarizer-sample-linear analyzer or Senarmont-type polarizer-sample-compensator-analyzer systems. The effects of temperature and wavelength variations are additionally examined and found to be comparatively weak. A discussion on the virtues and drawbacks of the above systems concludes the paper.

Key concepts: Polarizer, Spectrum analyzer, Optics, Phase (matter), Materials science, Physics, Birefringence, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Error analysis of circular polarizer–analyzer systems for phase retardation measurements — Research Paper | ScholarLens