1977IEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesRequires access

Optimum polarizer combinations for twisted nematic displays

T. J. Scheffer, J. Nehring

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

We present a simple phenomenological theory that makes it possible to compute the brightness and contrast ratio of reflective twisted nematic displays from the optical characteristics of their polarizers. The theory satisfactorily explains the large change in contrast ratio that is observed when the positions of the polarizers are interchanged in a reflective display assembled with dissimilar polarizer types. Brightness and contrast measurements are reported for reflective displays assembled with the four possible combinations of Polaroid HN-42 and HN-55 sheet-type polarizers, and the results are in good agreement with theory. Optical characteristics of polarizers are suggested which should markedly improve display viewability over what is currently obtainable. We find that a small increase in contrast ratio is possible if the front polarizer of a display is made stronger than the rear polarizer instead of employing identical polarizers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We present a simple phenomenological theory that makes it possible to compute the brightness and contrast ratio of reflective twisted nematic displays from the optical characteristics of their polarizers. The theory satisfactorily explains the large change in contrast ratio that is observed when the positions of the polarizers are interchanged in a reflective display assembled with dissimilar polarizer types. Brightness and contrast measurements are reported for reflective displays assembled with the four possible combinations of Polaroid HN-42 and HN-55 sheet-type polarizers, and the results are in good agreement with theory. Optical characteristics of polarizers are suggested which should markedly improve display viewability over what is currently obtainable. We find that a small increase in contrast ratio is possible if the front polarizer of a display is made stronger than the rear polarizer instead of employing identical polarizers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We present a simple phenomenological theory that makes it possible to compute the brightness and contrast ratio of reflective twisted nematic displays from the optical characteristics of their polarizers. The theory satisfactorily explains the large change in contrast ratio that is observed when the positions of the polarizers are interchanged in a reflective display assembled with dissimilar polarizer types. Brightness and contrast measurements are reported for reflective displays assembled with the four possible combinations of Polaroid HN-42 and HN-55 sheet-type polarizers, and the results are in good agreement with theory. Optical characteristics of polarizers are suggested which should markedly improve display viewability over what is currently obtainable. We find that a small increase in contrast ratio is possible if the front polarizer of a display is made stronger than the rear polarizer instead of employing identical polarizers.

Key concepts: Polarizer, Contrast ratio, Optics, Brightness, Liquid crystal, Liquid-crystal display, Contrast (vision), High contrast

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimum polarizer combinations for twisted nematic displays — Research Paper | ScholarLens