2001The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Highway traffic noise measurements compared to predictions from FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model

Judith L. Rochat, Gregg G. Fleming

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 1998, the United States Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released a new tool for highway traffic noise prediction and noise barrier design, the Traffic Noise Model (TNM). In order to assess the accuracy and make recommendations on the use of TNM for the FHWA, the Volpe Center Acoustics Facility performed numerous roadside measurements, obtaining over 100 h of traffic noise data from highways around the country. For each site, acoustical, meteorological, and traffic data were collected simultaneously throughout the measurement period. Spectrum analyzers were used to collect 1/3-octave band A-weighted equivalent sound levels, and the microphones were deployed at distances from 50 to 1300 ft from the roadway and at two heights off the ground, the number of microphones used being site dependent. In comparing the measured and TNM-predicted sound levels, results indicate that TNM is, on average, within 1 dB of the measured data for all types of sites combined. Grouping the data by site types shows how well TNM is performing for open (no barrier), acoustically soft ground sites; open, acoustically hard ground sites; and sites with noise barriers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1998, the United States Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released a new tool for highway traffic noise prediction and noise barrier design, the Traffic Noise Model (TNM). In order to assess the accuracy and make recommendations on the use of TNM for the FHWA, the Volpe Center Acoustics Facility performed numerous roadside measurements, obtaining over 100 h of traffic noise data from highways around the country. For each site, acoustical, meteorological, and traffic data were collected simultaneously throughout the measurement period. Spectrum analyzers were used to collect 1/3-octave band A-weighted equivalent sound levels, and the microphones were deployed at distances from 50 to 1300 ft from the roadway and at two heights off the ground, the number of microphones used being site dependent. In comparing the measured and TNM-predicted sound levels, results indicate that TNM is, on average, within 1 dB of the measured data for all types of sites combined. Grouping the data by site types shows how well TNM is performing for open (no barrier), acoustically soft ground sites; open, acoustically hard ground sites; and sites with noise barriers.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1998, the United States Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released a new tool for highway traffic noise prediction and noise barrier design, the Traffic Noise Model (TNM). In order to assess the accuracy and make recommendations on the use of TNM for the FHWA, the Volpe Center Acoustics Facility performed numerous roadside measurements, obtaining over 100 h of traffic noise data from highways around the country. For each site, acoustical, meteorological, and traffic data were collected simultaneously throughout the measurement period. Spectrum analyzers were used to collect 1/3-octave band A-weighted equivalent sound levels, and the microphones were deployed at distances from 50 to 1300 ft from the roadway and at two heights off the ground, the number of microphones used being site dependent. In comparing the measured and TNM-predicted sound levels, results indicate that TNM is, on average, within 1 dB of the measured data for all types of sites combined. Grouping the data by site types shows how well TNM is performing for open (no barrier), acoustically soft ground sites; open, acoustically hard ground sites; and sites with noise barriers.

Key concepts: Traffic noise, Noise (video), Noise barrier, Environmental science, Octave (electronics), Ambient noise level, Octave band, Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Highway traffic noise measurements compared to predictions from FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens