2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

Flexibility measurement of domain-specific reconfigurable hardware

Katherine Compton, Scott Hauck

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Traditional metrics used to compare hardware designs include area, performance, and power. However, these metrics do not form a complete evaluation of reconfigurable hardware. For these designs, flexibility is also a key issue, since it is the flexibility of reconfigurable hardware that allows it to implement a variety of circuits. Despite its importance, there is not yet an established method to measure flexibility. This paper explores the flexibility testing issue for domain-specific reconfigurable architectures. We discuss the concept of flexibility as it pertains to domain-specific architectures, and propose a flexibility testing technique involving synthetic circuit generation. This technique is then used to compare three different domain-specific architecture generation algorithms, demonstrating that the testing can in fact differentiate between architectures of differing levels of flexibility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Traditional metrics used to compare hardware designs include area, performance, and power. However, these metrics do not form a complete evaluation of reconfigurable hardware. For these designs, flexibility is also a key issue, since it is the flexibility of reconfigurable hardware that allows it to implement a variety of circuits. Despite its importance, there is not yet an established method to measure flexibility. This paper explores the flexibility testing issue for domain-specific reconfigurable architectures. We discuss the concept of flexibility as it pertains to domain-specific architectures, and propose a flexibility testing technique involving synthetic circuit generation. This technique is then used to compare three different domain-specific architecture generation algorithms, demonstrating that the testing can in fact differentiate between architectures of differing levels of flexibility.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Traditional metrics used to compare hardware designs include area, performance, and power. However, these metrics do not form a complete evaluation of reconfigurable hardware. For these designs, flexibility is also a key issue, since it is the flexibility of reconfigurable hardware that allows it to implement a variety of circuits. Despite its importance, there is not yet an established method to measure flexibility. This paper explores the flexibility testing issue for domain-specific reconfigurable architectures. We discuss the concept of flexibility as it pertains to domain-specific architectures, and propose a flexibility testing technique involving synthetic circuit generation. This technique is then used to compare three different domain-specific architecture generation algorithms, demonstrating that the testing can in fact differentiate between architectures of differing levels of flexibility.

Key concepts: Flexibility (engineering), Computer science, Computer architecture, Domain (mathematical analysis), Reconfigurable computing, Key (lock), Embedded system, Field-programmable gate array

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flexibility measurement of domain-specific reconfigurable hardware — Research Paper | ScholarLens