2011Journal of Landscape ArchitectureRequires access

Gardening forms: landscape architecture and gardening in Sven-Ingvar Andersson’s garden at Marnas

Julian Raxworthy

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Gardening and landscape architecture are historically related but are practically separate in contemporary landscape architectural practice, where landscape architecture is seen as a design practice and gardening as a trade or amateur activity. However, the long-term development of gardens and landscapes requires gardening actions to achieve the predicted planting outcome of the initial design. Furthermore, this separation means that landscape architects are unable to optimise emergent qualities that arise from the growth of the garden. In this essay the relationship between gardening and landscape architecture is examined using the case study of Sven-Ingvar Andersson’s garden at Marnas in Sweden. The Marnas garden was chosen because Andersson himself used his garden as both a rhetorical tool and a laboratory to consider the relationship between landscape design and gardening. Aspects of the relationship between planting design and pruning, as a means of generating form by manipulating plant morphology, are considered and tested against three parts of the Marnas garden. From this case study, the opportunities offered by gardening for form generation are considered and models of practice from Andersson’s experience proposed. Finally, the essay suggests that landscape architecture can modify its practice models to incorporate long-term involvement in projects, by directly undertaking gardening in real time, rather than simply designing using simulation in predictive representations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Gardening and landscape architecture are historically related but are practically separate in contemporary landscape architectural practice, where landscape architecture is seen as a design practice and gardening as a trade or amateur activity. However, the long-term development of gardens and landscapes requires gardening actions to achieve the predicted planting outcome of the initial design. Furthermore, this separation means that landscape architects are unable to optimise emergent qualities that arise from the growth of the garden. In this essay the relationship between gardening and landscape architecture is examined using the case study of Sven-Ingvar Andersson’s garden at Marnas in Sweden. The Marnas garden was chosen because Andersson himself used his garden as both a rhetorical tool and a laboratory to consider the relationship between landscape design and gardening. Aspects of the relationship between planting design and pruning, as a means of generating form by manipulating plant morphology, are considered and tested against three parts of the Marnas garden. From this case study, the opportunities offered by gardening for form generation are considered and models of practice from Andersson’s experience proposed. Finally, the essay suggests that landscape architecture can modify its practice models to incorporate long-term involvement in projects, by directly undertaking gardening in real time, rather than simply designing using simulation in predictive representations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Gardening and landscape architecture are historically related but are practically separate in contemporary landscape architectural practice, where landscape architecture is seen as a design practice and gardening as a trade or amateur activity. However, the long-term development of gardens and landscapes requires gardening actions to achieve the predicted planting outcome of the initial design. Furthermore, this separation means that landscape architects are unable to optimise emergent qualities that arise from the growth of the garden. In this essay the relationship between gardening and landscape architecture is examined using the case study of Sven-Ingvar Andersson’s garden at Marnas in Sweden. The Marnas garden was chosen because Andersson himself used his garden as both a rhetorical tool and a laboratory to consider the relationship between landscape design and gardening. Aspects of the relationship between planting design and pruning, as a means of generating form by manipulating plant morphology, are considered and tested against three parts of the Marnas garden. From this case study, the opportunities offered by gardening for form generation are considered and models of practice from Andersson’s experience proposed. Finally, the essay suggests that landscape architecture can modify its practice models to incorporate long-term involvement in projects, by directly undertaking gardening in real time, rather than simply designing using simulation in predictive representations.

Key concepts: Landscape architecture, Garden design, Landscape design, Amateur, Landscape architect, Architecture, Architectural engineering, Hard landscape materials

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gardening forms: landscape architecture and gardening in Sven-Ingvar Andersson’s garden at Marnas — Research Paper | ScholarLens