2009Chinese Education & SocietyRequires access

Policies on Private Education

Fengqiao Yan

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Basic principles and analytical methods of economics are used to conduct a preliminary study of state policies for private education in China. It is evident that if public policy is to exert a positive effect on private education, the government must formulate policies at a higher level for private education and give equal attention to choice, efficiency, and equity of education. The objective of education is to enable those receiving an education to acquire all-around development, and publicly operated and private education are merely different means of realizing this objective. Hence, the requirements and the interests of those being educated should be given first consideration when formulating policies for private education. In addition to using governance as a policy tool, the government should emphasize the use of such policy tools as finance, public infrastructure, and construction to conduct effective regulation and intervention in the private education system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Basic principles and analytical methods of economics are used to conduct a preliminary study of state policies for private education in China. It is evident that if public policy is to exert a positive effect on private education, the government must formulate policies at a higher level for private education and give equal attention to choice, efficiency, and equity of education. The objective of education is to enable those receiving an education to acquire all-around development, and publicly operated and private education are merely different means of realizing this objective. Hence, the requirements and the interests of those being educated should be given first consideration when formulating policies for private education. In addition to using governance as a policy tool, the government should emphasize the use of such policy tools as finance, public infrastructure, and construction to conduct effective regulation and intervention in the private education system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Basic principles and analytical methods of economics are used to conduct a preliminary study of state policies for private education in China. It is evident that if public policy is to exert a positive effect on private education, the government must formulate policies at a higher level for private education and give equal attention to choice, efficiency, and equity of education. The objective of education is to enable those receiving an education to acquire all-around development, and publicly operated and private education are merely different means of realizing this objective. Hence, the requirements and the interests of those being educated should be given first consideration when formulating policies for private education. In addition to using governance as a policy tool, the government should emphasize the use of such policy tools as finance, public infrastructure, and construction to conduct effective regulation and intervention in the private education system.

Key concepts: Education policy, Private education, Corporate governance, Equity (law), Higher education, Government (linguistics), Public policy, Public economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Policies on Private Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens