1980Ground WaterRequires access

Control of Ground‐Water Salinity, Orange County, California

Mark J. Hammer, Gordon L. Elser

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Orange County Water District in Southern California imports approximately 75 percent of its supply from aqueducts drawing waters from the Colorado River and Northern California. Twenty‐five percent comes from natural flow in the Santa Ana River and local precipitation. Only about one‐half of the aqueduct water is treated and distributed in pipelines. The other one‐half is applied to infiltration basins and ponds for ground‐water recharge. This allows communities within the District to draw ground water as their major supply, which is supplemented by aqueduct water purchased after treatment by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The economic advantages of ground‐water recharge, as opposed to direct use of surface supplies, include eliminating water treatment, minimizing the size of pipe networks to distribute potable supplies, and reducing the requirement for storage reservoirs. However, using the basin aquifers as a reservoir to balance cyclic supply and demand creates two possible problems: excessive pumping lowers the fresh‐water table below sea level, and infiltration can result in a gradual increase in the level of dissolved salts in the ground water. Sea‐water intrusion has been greatly reduced by injection wells that provide a hydraulic barrier between the salt water and fresh inland water. Salt accumulation in the basin is a more serious long‐term problem since the salinity in the Colorado River water is increasing. Greater use of less salty Northern California water and reducing unwanted seepage of waste waters containing high dissolved solids are two of the remedial measures being implemented at present.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The Orange County Water District in Southern California imports approximately 75 percent of its supply from aqueducts drawing waters from the Colorado River and Northern California. Twenty‐five percent comes from natural flow in the Santa Ana River and local precipitation. Only about one‐half of the aqueduct water is treated and distributed in pipelines. The other one‐half is applied to infiltration basins and ponds for ground‐water recharge. This allows communities within the District to draw ground water as their major supply, which is supplemented by aqueduct water purchased after treatment by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The economic advantages of ground‐water recharge, as opposed to direct use of surface supplies, include eliminating water treatment, minimizing the size of pipe networks to distribute potable supplies, and reducing the requirement for storage reservoirs. However, using the basin aquifers as a reservoir to balance cyclic supply and demand creates two possible problems: excessive pumping lowers the fresh‐water table below sea level, and infiltration can result in a gradual increase in the level of dissolved salts in the ground water. Sea‐water intrusion has been greatly reduced by injection wells that provide a hydraulic barrier between the salt water and fresh inland water. Salt accumulation in the basin is a more serious long‐term problem since the salinity in the Colorado River water is increasing. Greater use of less salty Northern California water and reducing unwanted seepage of waste waters containing high dissolved solids are two of the remedial measures being implemented at present.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The Orange County Water District in Southern California imports approximately 75 percent of its supply from aqueducts drawing waters from the Colorado River and Northern California. Twenty‐five percent comes from natural flow in the Santa Ana River and local precipitation. Only about one‐half of the aqueduct water is treated and distributed in pipelines. The other one‐half is applied to infiltration basins and ponds for ground‐water recharge. This allows communities within the District to draw ground water as their major supply, which is supplemented by aqueduct water purchased after treatment by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The economic advantages of ground‐water recharge, as opposed to direct use of surface supplies, include eliminating water treatment, minimizing the size of pipe networks to distribute potable supplies, and reducing the requirement for storage reservoirs. However, using the basin aquifers as a reservoir to balance cyclic supply and demand creates two possible problems: excessive pumping lowers the fresh‐water table below sea level, and infiltration can result in a gradual increase in the level of dissolved salts in the ground water. Sea‐water intrusion has been greatly reduced by injection wells that provide a hydraulic barrier between the salt water and fresh inland water. Salt accumulation in the basin is a more serious long‐term problem since the salinity in the Colorado River water is increasing. Greater use of less salty Northern California water and reducing unwanted seepage of waste waters containing high dissolved solids are two of the remedial measures being implemented at present.

Key concepts: Groundwater recharge, Groundwater, Aquifer, Hydrology (agriculture), Environmental science, Water table, Saltwater intrusion, Infiltration (HVAC)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Control of Ground‐Water Salinity, Orange County, California — Research Paper | ScholarLens