2011Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and TherapeuticsRequires access

Preoperative Subpterygial Mitomycin C Injection Versus Limbal Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation for Prevention of Pterygium Recurrence

Sameh S. Mandour, Hassan G. Farahat, Hala M. Mohamed

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative outcome and recurrence rate after primary pterygium excision using preoperative Mitomycin C (MMC) injection versus limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation (LCAT). METHODS: Ninety-one eyes with primary pterygium were divided into 2 groups. Group A eyes (included 48 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision 1 month after subpterygial injection of MMC 0.015%. Group B eyes (included 43 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision followed by LCAT technique. Pterygium regrowth over the cornea for 1 mm or more was considered as a recurrence. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 24 months. In group A, reported recurrence was found in 2 (4.2%) eyes with a complication rate of 16.80%. While in group B, recurrence was reported in 4 (9.3%) eyes with a complication rate of 11.63%. No serious postoperative complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the recurrence rate as well as the complication rate. CONCLUSION: Both techniques used in the current study proved to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate after excision of primary nasal pterygium with minimal postoperative complications. Preoperative MMC injection was technically easier, with shorter operative and preservation of healthy conjunctiva. However, LCAT is a one-stage procedure and independent from adjunctive pharmacological or radiation therapies with their hazards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative outcome and recurrence rate after primary pterygium excision using preoperative Mitomycin C (MMC) injection versus limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation (LCAT). METHODS: Ninety-one eyes with primary pterygium were divided into 2 groups. Group A eyes (included 48 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision 1 month after subpterygial injection of MMC 0.015%. Group B eyes (included 43 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision followed by LCAT technique. Pterygium regrowth over the cornea for 1 mm or more was considered as a recurrence. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 24 months. In group A, reported recurrence was found in 2 (4.2%) eyes with a complication rate of 16.80%. While in group B, recurrence was reported in 4 (9.3%) eyes with a complication rate of 11.63%. No serious postoperative complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the recurrence rate as well as the complication rate. CONCLUSION: Both techniques used in the current study proved to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate after excision of primary nasal pterygium with minimal postoperative complications. Preoperative MMC injection was technically easier, with shorter operative and preservation of healthy conjunctiva. However, LCAT is a one-stage procedure and independent from adjunctive pharmacological or radiation therapies with their hazards.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative outcome and recurrence rate after primary pterygium excision using preoperative Mitomycin C (MMC) injection versus limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation (LCAT). METHODS: Ninety-one eyes with primary pterygium were divided into 2 groups. Group A eyes (included 48 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision 1 month after subpterygial injection of MMC 0.015%. Group B eyes (included 43 eyes) were operated upon with pterygium excision followed by LCAT technique. Pterygium regrowth over the cornea for 1 mm or more was considered as a recurrence. RESULTS: The follow-up period was 24 months. In group A, reported recurrence was found in 2 (4.2%) eyes with a complication rate of 16.80%. While in group B, recurrence was reported in 4 (9.3%) eyes with a complication rate of 11.63%. No serious postoperative complications were reported. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the recurrence rate as well as the complication rate. CONCLUSION: Both techniques used in the current study proved to be effective in reducing the recurrence rate after excision of primary nasal pterygium with minimal postoperative complications. Preoperative MMC injection was technically easier, with shorter operative and preservation of healthy conjunctiva. However, LCAT is a one-stage procedure and independent from adjunctive pharmacological or radiation therapies with their hazards.

Key concepts: Pterygium, Medicine, Surgery, Complication, Mitomycin C, Conjunctiva, Transplantation, Cornea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preoperative Subpterygial Mitomycin C Injection Versus Limbal Conjunctival Autograft Transplantation for Prevention of Pterygium Recurrence — Research Paper | ScholarLens