The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry
Antonio Lleó, Asunción Marcos, Manuel Calatayud, Luis Martı́nez Alonso, Saleh M Ranhal, Juan Alberto Sanchis‐Gimeno
Abstract
Antonio Lleó, Asunción Marcos, Manuel Calatayud, Luis Martı́nez Alonso, Saleh M Ranhal, Juan Alberto Sanchis‐Gimeno
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness in a large sample of healthy eyes. METHOD: Five hundred eyes of 500 subjects (253 women, 50.6 per cent and 247 men, 49.4 per cent) were analysed in a prospective healthy population study. Mean age of the sample was 31 +/- 8 years. Goldmann applanation tonometry was carried out by one physician. Tonometric values were the mean of three consecutive readings. Subsequently, another physician carried out ultrasonic pachymetry with the DGH 2000 AP ultrasonic pachymeter (DGH Technology Inc, San Diego, USA). Ten measurements were made at the centre of the cornea of each eye. The lowest value was used for analysis. RESULTS: Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness were correlated (r = 0.184, p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between corneal thickness and age (r = 0.083, p = 0.065), mean spherical equivalent refraction (r = 0.083, p = 0.065) or visual acuity (r = 0.036, p = 0.187). CONCLUSION: In normal eyes, there is no statistically significant correlation between changes of intraocular pressure and changes of central corneal thickness but they suggest a relationship between intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Goldmann applanation tonometry has a systematic error in accuracy of intraocular pressure readings of healthy eyes caused by its dependence on central corneal thickness. Measurement of corneal thickness by optometrists should be the first step in diagnosing intraocular pressure pathologies.
OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness in a large sample of healthy eyes. METHOD: Five hundred eyes of 500 subjects (253 women, 50.6 per cent and 247 men, 49.4 per cent) were analysed in a prospective healthy population study. Mean age of the sample was 31 +/- 8 years. Goldmann applanation tonometry was carried out by one physician. Tonometric values were the mean of three consecutive readings. Subsequently, another physician carried out ultrasonic pachymetry with the DGH 2000 AP ultrasonic pachymeter (DGH Technology Inc, San Diego, USA). Ten measurements were made at the centre of the cornea of each eye. The lowest value was used for analysis. RESULTS: Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness were correlated (r = 0.184, p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between corneal thickness and age (r = 0.083, p = 0.065), mean spherical equivalent refraction (r = 0.083, p = 0.065) or visual acuity (r = 0.036, p = 0.187). CONCLUSION: In normal eyes, there is no statistically significant correlation between changes of intraocular pressure and changes of central corneal thickness but they suggest a relationship between intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Goldmann applanation tonometry has a systematic error in accuracy of intraocular pressure readings of healthy eyes caused by its dependence on central corneal thickness. Measurement of corneal thickness by optometrists should be the first step in diagnosing intraocular pressure pathologies.
Key concepts: Applanation tonometry, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Intraocular pressure, Cornea, Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Corneal pachymetry, Optometry