2000Applied Entomology and ZoologyOpen access

Populational variation in diapause-induction and -termination of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Mohammed-Hanif Qureshi, Tamotsu Murai, Hideya Yoshida, Hisaaki Tsumuki

Open full text 23 citations

Abstract

Diapause induction and termination were compared among three different geographic populations of Helicoverpa armigera from Ishigaki (24.3° N; 124.2°E), Okayama (Ushimado, 34.6° N; 134.1°E) and Kanazawa (36.6°N; 136.7°E) in Japan. The critical daylength for pupal diapause induction among the three populations was between 12L:12D and 14L:10D in the larval stage. No clinal latitudinal variation in the critical daylength was found among the three populations. Most of the diapausing pupae emerged when they were continuously maintained at 20°C under 12L:12D, suggesting that cold exposure (chilling) is not necessary to break the pupal diapause. Furthermore, the time required for diapause termination of the Okayama population was the longest (214 days), followed by the Ishigaki (149 days) and Kanazawa (73 days) populations at 20°C (without chilling) under the 12L:12D photoperiod. These results showed no clinal latitudinal variation in diapause termination.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diapause induction and termination were compared among three different geographic populations of Helicoverpa armigera from Ishigaki (24.3° N; 124.2°E), Okayama (Ushimado, 34.6° N; 134.1°E) and Kanazawa (36.6°N; 136.7°E) in Japan. The critical daylength for pupal diapause induction among the three populations was between 12L:12D and 14L:10D in the larval stage. No clinal latitudinal variation in the critical daylength was found among the three populations. Most of the diapausing pupae emerged when they were continuously maintained at 20°C under 12L:12D, suggesting that cold exposure (chilling) is not necessary to break the pupal diapause. Furthermore, the time required for diapause termination of the Okayama population was the longest (214 days), followed by the Ishigaki (149 days) and Kanazawa (73 days) populations at 20°C (without chilling) under the 12L:12D photoperiod. These results showed no clinal latitudinal variation in diapause termination.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diapause induction and termination were compared among three different geographic populations of Helicoverpa armigera from Ishigaki (24.3° N; 124.2°E), Okayama (Ushimado, 34.6° N; 134.1°E) and Kanazawa (36.6°N; 136.7°E) in Japan. The critical daylength for pupal diapause induction among the three populations was between 12L:12D and 14L:10D in the larval stage. No clinal latitudinal variation in the critical daylength was found among the three populations. Most of the diapausing pupae emerged when they were continuously maintained at 20°C under 12L:12D, suggesting that cold exposure (chilling) is not necessary to break the pupal diapause. Furthermore, the time required for diapause termination of the Okayama population was the longest (214 days), followed by the Ishigaki (149 days) and Kanazawa (73 days) populations at 20°C (without chilling) under the 12L:12D photoperiod. These results showed no clinal latitudinal variation in diapause termination.

Key concepts: Diapause, Biology, Helicoverpa armigera, Pupa, Lepidoptera genitalia, Noctuidae, photoperiodism, Larva

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Populational variation in diapause-induction and -termination of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). — Research Paper | ScholarLens