Defocusing for the Schulz Technique of Determining Preferred Orientation
Erich Tenckhoff
Abstract
Erich Tenckhoff
Abstract
During measurement of preferred crystallographic orientation with the Schulz x-ray diffraction technique, several factors can cause defocusing. Earlier investigations showed that tilt of the specimen in Φ, the angle between the normal to the sample surface and the normal to the diffracting plane, is the most severe limitation for the Schulz reflection technique. The present study shows that this defocusing effect is strongly dependent on the size of the Bragg diffraction angle θ: The greater the Bragg angle, the smaller the decrease in intensity for a given tilt angle of Φ. On the other hand, the absorption coefficient μ of the sample has no influence on the decrease in intensity with increasing tilt in Φ, and its effect is negligibly small for most metals. Correction factors for the loss of intensity can be derived and have a general analytic form, but different coefficients are required for each goniometer setting.
OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
During measurement of preferred crystallographic orientation with the Schulz x-ray diffraction technique, several factors can cause defocusing. Earlier investigations showed that tilt of the specimen in Φ, the angle between the normal to the sample surface and the normal to the diffracting plane, is the most severe limitation for the Schulz reflection technique. The present study shows that this defocusing effect is strongly dependent on the size of the Bragg diffraction angle θ: The greater the Bragg angle, the smaller the decrease in intensity for a given tilt angle of Φ. On the other hand, the absorption coefficient μ of the sample has no influence on the decrease in intensity with increasing tilt in Φ, and its effect is negligibly small for most metals. Correction factors for the loss of intensity can be derived and have a general analytic form, but different coefficients are required for each goniometer setting.
Key concepts: Goniometer, Tilt (camera), Optics, Bragg's law, Intensity (physics), Orientation (vector space), Reflection (computer programming), Diffraction