Scientific design rationale
Steven R. Haynes, Paula M. Bach, John M. Carroll
Abstract
Steven R. Haynes, Paula M. Bach, John M. Carroll
Abstract
Abstract Design rationale should be regarded both as a tool for the practice of design, and as a method to enable thescienceof design. Design rationale answers questions about why a given design takes the form that it does. Answers to thesewhyquestions represent a significant portion of the knowledge generated from design research. This knowledge, along with that from empirical studies of designs in use, contributes to what Simon calledthe sciences of the artificial. Most research on the nature and use of design rationale has been analytic or theoretical. In this article, we describe an empirical study of the roles that design rationale can play in the conduct of design research. We report results from an interview study with 16 design researchers investigating how they construe and carry out design as research. The results include an integrated framework of the affordances design rationale can contribute to design research. The framework and supporting qualitative data provide insight into how design rationale might be more effectively leveraged as a first-class methodology for research into the creation and use of artifacts.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Design rationale should be regarded both as a tool for the practice of design, and as a method to enable thescienceof design. Design rationale answers questions about why a given design takes the form that it does. Answers to thesewhyquestions represent a significant portion of the knowledge generated from design research. This knowledge, along with that from empirical studies of designs in use, contributes to what Simon calledthe sciences of the artificial. Most research on the nature and use of design rationale has been analytic or theoretical. In this article, we describe an empirical study of the roles that design rationale can play in the conduct of design research. We report results from an interview study with 16 design researchers investigating how they construe and carry out design as research. The results include an integrated framework of the affordances design rationale can contribute to design research. The framework and supporting qualitative data provide insight into how design rationale might be more effectively leveraged as a first-class methodology for research into the creation and use of artifacts.
Key concepts: Affordance, Research design, Design science, Management science, Computer science, Empirical research, Class (philosophy), Design methods