2013Unpublished venueRequires access

What are the siblings of design science research

Paul Johannesson, Erik Perjons, Ilia Bider

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

There is no common agreement on how to characterize and positioning design science research. This makes it difficult for design science researchers to communicate the ideas of design science research to students, young researchers, and researchers outside the design science research community. In this paper, we present an approach for supporting the positioning of design science research in respect to key notions such as social science, research strategies, practice research, and action research. The approach is based on Wittgenstein’s notion of family resemblance, and the question addressed in the paper is: What are the siblings to design science research? Four sibling groups are presented, and the paper suggests how design science research can be compared and contrasted to its siblings within these groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is no common agreement on how to characterize and positioning design science research. This makes it difficult for design science researchers to communicate the ideas of design science research to students, young researchers, and researchers outside the design science research community. In this paper, we present an approach for supporting the positioning of design science research in respect to key notions such as social science, research strategies, practice research, and action research. The approach is based on Wittgenstein’s notion of family resemblance, and the question addressed in the paper is: What are the siblings to design science research? Four sibling groups are presented, and the paper suggests how design science research can be compared and contrasted to its siblings within these groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is no common agreement on how to characterize and positioning design science research. This makes it difficult for design science researchers to communicate the ideas of design science research to students, young researchers, and researchers outside the design science research community. In this paper, we present an approach for supporting the positioning of design science research in respect to key notions such as social science, research strategies, practice research, and action research. The approach is based on Wittgenstein’s notion of family resemblance, and the question addressed in the paper is: What are the siblings to design science research? Four sibling groups are presented, and the paper suggests how design science research can be compared and contrasted to its siblings within these groups.

Key concepts: Design science, Research design, Design science research, Developmental Science, Computer science, Sociology, Engineering ethics, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What are the siblings of design science research — Research Paper | ScholarLens