2012•The International Journal of Human Resource ManagementRequires access

Supporting workplace dispute resolution in smaller businesses: policy perspectives and operational realities

Lynette Harris, Alan J. Tuckman, Jeremé Snook

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Following the 2007 Gibbons review and the subsequent repeal of the statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures in April 2009, the resolution of workplace conflict through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) continues to be a topical issue in the UK. Using a qualitative case study methodology, this paper examines the approaches to dispute resolution adopted by owners and managers in small businesses and the operational realities that shape their handling of individual disputes. The findings reveal a support for early and informal conflict resolution, but also a lack of knowledge about ADR and what it can offer. The conclusion is that, whilst ADR offers real benefits to small business employers and their employees, the dominant concern of these parties appears to be their ability to defend decisions they have taken in the event of litigation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Following the 2007 Gibbons review and the subsequent repeal of the statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures in April 2009, the resolution of workplace conflict through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) continues to be a topical issue in the UK. Using a qualitative case study methodology, this paper examines the approaches to dispute resolution adopted by owners and managers in small businesses and the operational realities that shape their handling of individual disputes. The findings reveal a support for early and informal conflict resolution, but also a lack of knowledge about ADR and what it can offer. The conclusion is that, whilst ADR offers real benefits to small business employers and their employees, the dominant concern of these parties appears to be their ability to defend decisions they have taken in the event of litigation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Following the 2007 Gibbons review and the subsequent repeal of the statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures in April 2009, the resolution of workplace conflict through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) continues to be a topical issue in the UK. Using a qualitative case study methodology, this paper examines the approaches to dispute resolution adopted by owners and managers in small businesses and the operational realities that shape their handling of individual disputes. The findings reveal a support for early and informal conflict resolution, but also a lack of knowledge about ADR and what it can offer. The conclusion is that, whilst ADR offers real benefits to small business employers and their employees, the dominant concern of these parties appears to be their ability to defend decisions they have taken in the event of litigation.

Key concepts: Grievance, Alternative dispute resolution, Dispute resolution, Resolution (logic), Statutory law, Repeal, Business, Public relations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supporting workplace dispute resolution in smaller businesses: policy perspectives and operational realities — Research Paper | ScholarLens