2011The World Bank Research ObserverOpen access

Coping with Crises: Policies to Protect Employment and Earnings

Pierella Paci, Ana Revenga, Bob Rijkers

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

The continuing failure of many countries to adequately mitigate the adverse labor market impacts of economic downturns is of concern, since labor market volatility can exacerbate poverty and stunt growth.This article aims to identify potentially effective policies responses to crises by navigating the potential tradeoffs between offsetting adverse shortterm impacts of economic downturns on the quantity and quality of jobs, and preserving incentives for economic recovery.The authors propose a taxonomy that categorizes interventions depending on whether they mitigate the negative short-term impact of crises or whether they stimulate recovery.The taxonomy helps policymakers to identify "winwin" policies that avoid potential tradeoffs between these objectives by simultaneously serving both.Common elements of effective interventions are feasibility, flexibility (for example the capacity for scaling up and down), and incentive compatibility-and there is no substitute for being prepared.Having sound safety nets in place before a crisis is superior to haphazardly implementing responses after a crisis hits.JEL codes: E24,

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The continuing failure of many countries to adequately mitigate the adverse labor market impacts of economic downturns is of concern, since labor market volatility can exacerbate poverty and stunt growth.This article aims to identify potentially effective policies responses to crises by navigating the potential tradeoffs between offsetting adverse shortterm impacts of economic downturns on the quantity and quality of jobs, and preserving incentives for economic recovery.The authors propose a taxonomy that categorizes interventions depending on whether they mitigate the negative short-term impact of crises or whether they stimulate recovery.The taxonomy helps policymakers to identify "winwin" policies that avoid potential tradeoffs between these objectives by simultaneously serving both.Common elements of effective interventions are feasibility, flexibility (for example the capacity for scaling up and down), and incentive compatibility-and there is no substitute for being prepared.Having sound safety nets in place before a crisis is superior to haphazardly implementing responses after a crisis hits.JEL codes: E24,

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The continuing failure of many countries to adequately mitigate the adverse labor market impacts of economic downturns is of concern, since labor market volatility can exacerbate poverty and stunt growth.This article aims to identify potentially effective policies responses to crises by navigating the potential tradeoffs between offsetting adverse shortterm impacts of economic downturns on the quantity and quality of jobs, and preserving incentives for economic recovery.The authors propose a taxonomy that categorizes interventions depending on whether they mitigate the negative short-term impact of crises or whether they stimulate recovery.The taxonomy helps policymakers to identify "winwin" policies that avoid potential tradeoffs between these objectives by simultaneously serving both.Common elements of effective interventions are feasibility, flexibility (for example the capacity for scaling up and down), and incentive compatibility-and there is no substitute for being prepared.Having sound safety nets in place before a crisis is superior to haphazardly implementing responses after a crisis hits.JEL codes: E24,

Key concepts: Incentive, Psychological intervention, Earnings, Economics, Coping (psychology), Economic recovery, Business, Market failure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coping with Crises: Policies to Protect Employment and Earnings — Research Paper | ScholarLens