ScholarLens Back to search
2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Conductor Loss Computation of Suspended Asymmetric Coplanar Waveguide

Puneet Singh, Arun Kumar Verma

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this paper the conductor loss computation of suspended asymmetric coplanar wave guide (ACPW) is presented using quasi static spectral domain approach (SDA) method that incorporates the two layer conductor model of conductor and finite conductivity. The results of present method is compared with EM simulator-HFSS and CST in the frequency range 1-100 GHz. The average deviation in effective dielectric constant and conductor loss is about 1.27% and 11.0% respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper the conductor loss computation of suspended asymmetric coplanar wave guide (ACPW) is presented using quasi static spectral domain approach (SDA) method that incorporates the two layer conductor model of conductor and finite conductivity. The results of present method is compared with EM simulator-HFSS and CST in the frequency range 1-100 GHz. The average deviation in effective dielectric constant and conductor loss is about 1.27% and 11.0% respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper the conductor loss computation of suspended asymmetric coplanar wave guide (ACPW) is presented using quasi static spectral domain approach (SDA) method that incorporates the two layer conductor model of conductor and finite conductivity. The results of present method is compared with EM simulator-HFSS and CST in the frequency range 1-100 GHz. The average deviation in effective dielectric constant and conductor loss is about 1.27% and 11.0% respectively.

Key concepts: Conductor, HFSS, Coplanar waveguide, Computation, Electrical conductor, Dielectric, Perfect conductor, Dielectric loss

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conductor Loss Computation of Suspended Asymmetric Coplanar Waveguide — Research Paper | ScholarLens