EXPERIENCE AND REFLECTION ON THE USE OF RUBRICS FOR SENIOR CAPSTIONE DESIGN COURSE ASSESSMENT
Robert W. Brennan, Theodor I. Freiheit, Tayyaba Khan, S. Spiewak
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert W. Brennan, Theodor I. Freiheit, Tayyaba Khan, S. Spiewak
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this paper we report on our experience with the use of rubrics for the assessment of senior capstone design reports and presentations. The motivation for this approach to assessment was to create tools that have clear requirements, are clearly linked to the course objectives, are flexible, and are fair. The paper provides a summary of the main rubrics used for assessment as well as an analysis of their use both in the form of student feedback and the authors’ general impressions.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper we report on our experience with the use of rubrics for the assessment of senior capstone design reports and presentations. The motivation for this approach to assessment was to create tools that have clear requirements, are clearly linked to the course objectives, are flexible, and are fair. The paper provides a summary of the main rubrics used for assessment as well as an analysis of their use both in the form of student feedback and the authors’ general impressions.
Key concepts: Rubric, Course (navigation), Capstone, Peer assessment, Reflection (computer programming), Capstone course, Standards-based assessment, Computer science