Quality-based assessment of papers and projects in computer science
Suzanne Wagner Dietrich, Susan G. Haag, Leah Folkestad
Abstract
Suzanne Wagner Dietrich, Susan G. Haag, Leah Folkestad
Abstract
One of the main concepts of quality-based assessment is to provide students with scoring rubrics to define expectations on assignments so that students are actively involved in self-assessment. Another feature of quality-based assessment is to guide the assessment of student work where there is a reduced number of outcomes, such as in the assessment of papers and projects. This paper reports on experiences incorporating some concepts from quality-based assessment in courses offered in a computer science department. Scoring rubrics are introduced in the assessment process for self, peer, and instructor evaluation of papers and projects with a limited number of outcomes. The use of the rubrics as an assessment form provides a direct correspondence between the expectations and the assessed score. The quality-based assessment mechanisms described can be facilitated by course management tools in online-enhanced courses. The results of a student survey indicate that rubrics provide clear feedback and the self and peer assessment aided in student learning.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One of the main concepts of quality-based assessment is to provide students with scoring rubrics to define expectations on assignments so that students are actively involved in self-assessment. Another feature of quality-based assessment is to guide the assessment of student work where there is a reduced number of outcomes, such as in the assessment of papers and projects. This paper reports on experiences incorporating some concepts from quality-based assessment in courses offered in a computer science department. Scoring rubrics are introduced in the assessment process for self, peer, and instructor evaluation of papers and projects with a limited number of outcomes. The use of the rubrics as an assessment form provides a direct correspondence between the expectations and the assessed score. The quality-based assessment mechanisms described can be facilitated by course management tools in online-enhanced courses. The results of a student survey indicate that rubrics provide clear feedback and the self and peer assessment aided in student learning.
Key concepts: Rubric, Peer assessment, Quality assessment, Standards-based assessment, Computer science, Quality (philosophy), Self-assessment, Online assessment