2010PubMedRequires access

A comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and metoclopramide in patients undergoing gynecological surgery.

Tuğsan Egemen Bilgin, Handan Birbiçer, Zeliha Özer, Nurcan Doruk, Ekrem C. Tok, Uğur Oral

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are some of the most-common and undesirable adverse effects after surgery performed under general anesthesia. We investigated the prophylactic value of dexamethasone as an alternate to ondansetron or metoclopramide to prevent PONV after gynecologic surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: One hundred sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective gynecologic surgery were enrolled. Before induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously dexamethasone (8 mg) in group D, ondansetron (4 mg) in group O, metoclopramide (10 mg) in group M, and saline (2 mL) in group P. Total incidence of nausea and vomiting, rescue antiemetic requirement, pain scores, and any adverse effects were recorded at 3 observational periods (0-2 hours, 2-12 hours, and 12-24 hours). RESULTS: Total rates of PON, POV, and PONV were significantly higher in group P at 0-2 hours and 2-12 hours compared with group D, O, and M (P<.05). There was no difference in PON, POV, and PONV among D, O, and M groups. None of the groups differed in PONV in the subsequent 12-24 hours. Number of patients requiring rescue antiemetic was significantly higher in group P than the other groups at 0-2 hours (10%, 10%, 15%, and 45% in group D, O, M, and P) (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IV dexamethasone 8 mg significantly reduces the incidence of PONV in gynecologic surgery. At this dosage, dexamethasone is as effective as ondansetron 4 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg, and is more-effective than placebo.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are some of the most-common and undesirable adverse effects after surgery performed under general anesthesia. We investigated the prophylactic value of dexamethasone as an alternate to ondansetron or metoclopramide to prevent PONV after gynecologic surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: One hundred sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective gynecologic surgery were enrolled. Before induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously dexamethasone (8 mg) in group D, ondansetron (4 mg) in group O, metoclopramide (10 mg) in group M, and saline (2 mL) in group P. Total incidence of nausea and vomiting, rescue antiemetic requirement, pain scores, and any adverse effects were recorded at 3 observational periods (0-2 hours, 2-12 hours, and 12-24 hours). RESULTS: Total rates of PON, POV, and PONV were significantly higher in group P at 0-2 hours and 2-12 hours compared with group D, O, and M (P<.05). There was no difference in PON, POV, and PONV among D, O, and M groups. None of the groups differed in PONV in the subsequent 12-24 hours. Number of patients requiring rescue antiemetic was significantly higher in group P than the other groups at 0-2 hours (10%, 10%, 15%, and 45% in group D, O, M, and P) (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IV dexamethasone 8 mg significantly reduces the incidence of PONV in gynecologic surgery. At this dosage, dexamethasone is as effective as ondansetron 4 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg, and is more-effective than placebo.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are some of the most-common and undesirable adverse effects after surgery performed under general anesthesia. We investigated the prophylactic value of dexamethasone as an alternate to ondansetron or metoclopramide to prevent PONV after gynecologic surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: One hundred sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective gynecologic surgery were enrolled. Before induction of anesthesia, patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenously dexamethasone (8 mg) in group D, ondansetron (4 mg) in group O, metoclopramide (10 mg) in group M, and saline (2 mL) in group P. Total incidence of nausea and vomiting, rescue antiemetic requirement, pain scores, and any adverse effects were recorded at 3 observational periods (0-2 hours, 2-12 hours, and 12-24 hours). RESULTS: Total rates of PON, POV, and PONV were significantly higher in group P at 0-2 hours and 2-12 hours compared with group D, O, and M (P<.05). There was no difference in PON, POV, and PONV among D, O, and M groups. None of the groups differed in PONV in the subsequent 12-24 hours. Number of patients requiring rescue antiemetic was significantly higher in group P than the other groups at 0-2 hours (10%, 10%, 15%, and 45% in group D, O, M, and P) (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IV dexamethasone 8 mg significantly reduces the incidence of PONV in gynecologic surgery. At this dosage, dexamethasone is as effective as ondansetron 4 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg, and is more-effective than placebo.

Key concepts: Metoclopramide, Medicine, Ondansetron, Antiemetic, Anesthesia, Vomiting, Nausea, Dexamethasone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of the antiemetic efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and metoclopramide in patients undergoing gynecological surgery. — Research Paper | ScholarLens