2012Egyptian Journal of AnaesthesiaOpen access

Postoperative nausea and vomiting management in maxillofacial procedures: Dexamethasone combined with metoclopramide

Essam M. Manaa, Sameh A. Seif

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

BackgroundEfficient prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a concern that needs to be addressed. There was a persistently high incidence of PONV despite prophylaxis with, metoclopramide, droperidol, dimenhydrinate or ondansetron when each was used alone in ‘at risk’ patients. Dexamethasone was also used as a stand alone drug in patients undergoing surgery. However, the current opinion questions the role of monotherapy. Drug combinations are deemed to be more useful for balanced anti-emesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic antiemetic effects of the combination dexamethasone–metoclopramide in patients undergoing maxillofacial procedures.Patients and methodsIn this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 208 outpatients under standardized anesthetic technique were randomized to receive dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group A), dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and placebo at the end of surgery (Group B), placebo before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group C) or placebo before anesthesia induction and at the end of surgery (Group D). Complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was defined as no vomiting, no sustained moderate nausea and no requesting of antiemetic drug.ResultsDuring predischarge period, the number of patients with complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was significantly higher in Groups B (90.4%) and A (86.5%) in comparison with Groups D (55.8%) and C (75%). At the 24 h follow-up evaluation, complete response was higher in Group A (96.2%) in comparison with Groups C (67.3%) and D (78.8%).ConclusionsDexamethasone–metoclopramide combination is not more effective than administration of dexamethasone alone in the prophylaxis of (PONV).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BackgroundEfficient prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a concern that needs to be addressed. There was a persistently high incidence of PONV despite prophylaxis with, metoclopramide, droperidol, dimenhydrinate or ondansetron when each was used alone in ‘at risk’ patients. Dexamethasone was also used as a stand alone drug in patients undergoing surgery. However, the current opinion questions the role of monotherapy. Drug combinations are deemed to be more useful for balanced anti-emesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic antiemetic effects of the combination dexamethasone–metoclopramide in patients undergoing maxillofacial procedures.Patients and methodsIn this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 208 outpatients under standardized anesthetic technique were randomized to receive dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group A), dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and placebo at the end of surgery (Group B), placebo before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group C) or placebo before anesthesia induction and at the end of surgery (Group D). Complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was defined as no vomiting, no sustained moderate nausea and no requesting of antiemetic drug.ResultsDuring predischarge period, the number of patients with complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was significantly higher in Groups B (90.4%) and A (86.5%) in comparison with Groups D (55.8%) and C (75%). At the 24 h follow-up evaluation, complete response was higher in Group A (96.2%) in comparison with Groups C (67.3%) and D (78.8%).ConclusionsDexamethasone–metoclopramide combination is not more effective than administration of dexamethasone alone in the prophylaxis of (PONV).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BackgroundEfficient prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) continues to be a concern that needs to be addressed. There was a persistently high incidence of PONV despite prophylaxis with, metoclopramide, droperidol, dimenhydrinate or ondansetron when each was used alone in ‘at risk’ patients. Dexamethasone was also used as a stand alone drug in patients undergoing surgery. However, the current opinion questions the role of monotherapy. Drug combinations are deemed to be more useful for balanced anti-emesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic antiemetic effects of the combination dexamethasone–metoclopramide in patients undergoing maxillofacial procedures.Patients and methodsIn this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 208 outpatients under standardized anesthetic technique were randomized to receive dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group A), dexamethasone 8 mg before anesthesia induction and placebo at the end of surgery (Group B), placebo before anesthesia induction and metoclopramide, 10 mg at the end of surgery (Group C) or placebo before anesthesia induction and at the end of surgery (Group D). Complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was defined as no vomiting, no sustained moderate nausea and no requesting of antiemetic drug.ResultsDuring predischarge period, the number of patients with complete response to prophylactic antiemetic medication was significantly higher in Groups B (90.4%) and A (86.5%) in comparison with Groups D (55.8%) and C (75%). At the 24 h follow-up evaluation, complete response was higher in Group A (96.2%) in comparison with Groups C (67.3%) and D (78.8%).ConclusionsDexamethasone–metoclopramide combination is not more effective than administration of dexamethasone alone in the prophylaxis of (PONV).

Key concepts: Metoclopramide, Medicine, Antiemetic, Anesthesia, Droperidol, Nausea, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Vomiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postoperative nausea and vomiting management in maxillofacial procedures: Dexamethasone combined with metoclopramide — Research Paper | ScholarLens