Reply to the Note of Jeremy Danning-Davies Reported Under ‘Further Comments on Khan’s So-Called ‘ Equation of Trickery’
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Abstract
Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Abstract
On the one hand the author of the „further comment‟ accepts that he is sceptical about theories of relativity and on the other hand he justifies the validity of „Equation of Trickery‟ on irrational, incorrect and self-contradictory basis. Mr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies does not know as to what he is writing and this I leave to the judgment of readers.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On the one hand the author of the „further comment‟ accepts that he is sceptical about theories of relativity and on the other hand he justifies the validity of „Equation of Trickery‟ on irrational, incorrect and self-contradictory basis. Mr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies does not know as to what he is writing and this I leave to the judgment of readers.
Key concepts: Irrational number, Skepticism, Philosophy, Epistemology, Theory of relativity, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Mathematics