On a "Theorem" of Peterson
Leslie Lamport
Abstract
Leslie Lamport
Abstract
This three-page note gives an example that appears to contradict a theorem in a TOPLAS article by Gary Peterson. Whether or not it does depends on the interpretation of the statement of the theorem, which is given only informally in English. I draw the moral that greater rigor is needed. When I sent this paper to Peterson, he strongly objected to it. I no longer have his message and don’t remember exactly what he wrote, but I think he said that he knew what the correct interpretation was and that I was unfairly suggesting that his theorem might be incorrect. So, I never published this note.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This three-page note gives an example that appears to contradict a theorem in a TOPLAS article by Gary Peterson. Whether or not it does depends on the interpretation of the statement of the theorem, which is given only informally in English. I draw the moral that greater rigor is needed. When I sent this paper to Peterson, he strongly objected to it. I no longer have his message and don’t remember exactly what he wrote, but I think he said that he knew what the correct interpretation was and that I was unfairly suggesting that his theorem might be incorrect. So, I never published this note.
Key concepts: Statement (logic), Interpretation (philosophy), Epistemology, Philosophy, Mathematical economics, Mathematics, Linguistics