2008PubMedRequires access

[A new ultrasonic system in initial periodontal therapy: clinical efficacy and perception of pain].

Yun Fu, Ning Yang, Chen Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and perception of pain during initial periodontal treatment using Vector-system and a conventional ultrasonic system. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mild to moderate periodontitis were debrided using both A-system (Vector-system) and B-system (Suprasson P5 Newtron) in a split mouth design. At baseline, one month after treatment, plaque index (PLI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded and probing depth(PD) was measured. A verbal analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the perceived pain right after the treatment. RESULTS: At one month evaluation, all areas showed an improvement in clinical parameters. No statistically significant differences in PD and BOP could be observed between areas treated by two different systems, while A-system contributed to greater improvement in PLI than B-system. Patients treated with A-system [(22.5 +/- 7.5) mm] experienced about 60% the amount of pain compared with the conventional ultrasonic device [(37.2 +/- 11.3) mm]. CONCLUSIONS: During initial periodontal treatment for the patients with mild to moderate periodontitis, A-system could achieve a comparable clinical efficacy and reduced pain sensations to conventional ultrasonic device.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and perception of pain during initial periodontal treatment using Vector-system and a conventional ultrasonic system. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mild to moderate periodontitis were debrided using both A-system (Vector-system) and B-system (Suprasson P5 Newtron) in a split mouth design. At baseline, one month after treatment, plaque index (PLI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded and probing depth(PD) was measured. A verbal analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the perceived pain right after the treatment. RESULTS: At one month evaluation, all areas showed an improvement in clinical parameters. No statistically significant differences in PD and BOP could be observed between areas treated by two different systems, while A-system contributed to greater improvement in PLI than B-system. Patients treated with A-system [(22.5 +/- 7.5) mm] experienced about 60% the amount of pain compared with the conventional ultrasonic device [(37.2 +/- 11.3) mm]. CONCLUSIONS: During initial periodontal treatment for the patients with mild to moderate periodontitis, A-system could achieve a comparable clinical efficacy and reduced pain sensations to conventional ultrasonic device.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and perception of pain during initial periodontal treatment using Vector-system and a conventional ultrasonic system. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mild to moderate periodontitis were debrided using both A-system (Vector-system) and B-system (Suprasson P5 Newtron) in a split mouth design. At baseline, one month after treatment, plaque index (PLI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded and probing depth(PD) was measured. A verbal analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the perceived pain right after the treatment. RESULTS: At one month evaluation, all areas showed an improvement in clinical parameters. No statistically significant differences in PD and BOP could be observed between areas treated by two different systems, while A-system contributed to greater improvement in PLI than B-system. Patients treated with A-system [(22.5 +/- 7.5) mm] experienced about 60% the amount of pain compared with the conventional ultrasonic device [(37.2 +/- 11.3) mm]. CONCLUSIONS: During initial periodontal treatment for the patients with mild to moderate periodontitis, A-system could achieve a comparable clinical efficacy and reduced pain sensations to conventional ultrasonic device.

Key concepts: Medicine, Periodontitis, Ultrasonic sensor, Dentistry, Bleeding on probing, Pain perception, Visual analogue scale, Clinical efficacy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[A new ultrasonic system in initial periodontal therapy: clinical efficacy and perception of pain]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens