Galvanic Corrosion of High Temperature Low Sag Aluminum Conductor Composite Core and Conventional Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced Overhead High Voltage Conductors
Eva Håkansson, Paul Predecki, M. Kumosa
Abstract
Eva Håkansson, Paul Predecki, M. Kumosa
Abstract
A High-Temperature Low-Sag Aluminum Conductor Composite Core (ACCC) bare overhead transmission line conductor utilizing a load bearing unidirectional carbon and glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite rod was evaluated for potential galvanic corrosion problems. A series of corrosion tests were performed in 0.5 M NaCl aqueous solution at room temperature, and at 85°C. The corrosion performance of the ACCC conductor was compared to a conventional Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) conductor. The bi-metallic ACSR design suffers inherently from galvanic corrosion, while the ACCC design does not develop galvanic corrosion unless its fiberglass composite galvanic corrosion barrier is compromised. Even with a severely compromised barrier in the ACCC conductor, the measured galvanic corrosion rate of the aluminum in the ACCC conductor was much lower than the galvanic corrosion rate measured in the ACSR conductor.
OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A High-Temperature Low-Sag Aluminum Conductor Composite Core (ACCC) bare overhead transmission line conductor utilizing a load bearing unidirectional carbon and glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite rod was evaluated for potential galvanic corrosion problems. A series of corrosion tests were performed in 0.5 M NaCl aqueous solution at room temperature, and at 85°C. The corrosion performance of the ACCC conductor was compared to a conventional Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) conductor. The bi-metallic ACSR design suffers inherently from galvanic corrosion, while the ACCC design does not develop galvanic corrosion unless its fiberglass composite galvanic corrosion barrier is compromised. Even with a severely compromised barrier in the ACCC conductor, the measured galvanic corrosion rate of the aluminum in the ACCC conductor was much lower than the galvanic corrosion rate measured in the ACSR conductor.
Key concepts: Galvanic corrosion, Materials science, Corrosion, Galvanic cell, Conductor, Electrical conductor, Aluminium, Composite material