1988Maritime Policy & ManagementRequires access

Freight forwarders speak: the Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project.Part 1

James Bird, Gail Nunlee Bland

Open publisher page 67 citations

Abstract

This paper, in two parts, reports on the Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project wherein a total of 72 interviews were held in 11 European countries. Respondents were also asked to fill in a questionnaire, and it is these questionnaire findings that are reported in this first part of the paper. These is a perhaps surprisingly widespread belief that frequency of shipping service is a main reason for choice of seaport in cargo movement. Time on the route and labour problems at ports are major concerns of freight forwarders whose minds are powerfully imbued with the spirit of free enterprise(absence of governmental or other planning agency intervention). Among other major conclusions are a preference for ‘delivered price’ consignments and the belief in the importance of port charges in route determination (see table 2 for summary of major conclusions).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper, in two parts, reports on the Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project wherein a total of 72 interviews were held in 11 European countries. Respondents were also asked to fill in a questionnaire, and it is these questionnaire findings that are reported in this first part of the paper. These is a perhaps surprisingly widespread belief that frequency of shipping service is a main reason for choice of seaport in cargo movement. Time on the route and labour problems at ports are major concerns of freight forwarders whose minds are powerfully imbued with the spirit of free enterprise(absence of governmental or other planning agency intervention). Among other major conclusions are a preference for ‘delivered price’ consignments and the belief in the importance of port charges in route determination (see table 2 for summary of major conclusions).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper, in two parts, reports on the Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project wherein a total of 72 interviews were held in 11 European countries. Respondents were also asked to fill in a questionnaire, and it is these questionnaire findings that are reported in this first part of the paper. These is a perhaps surprisingly widespread belief that frequency of shipping service is a main reason for choice of seaport in cargo movement. Time on the route and labour problems at ports are major concerns of freight forwarders whose minds are powerfully imbued with the spirit of free enterprise(absence of governmental or other planning agency intervention). Among other major conclusions are a preference for ‘delivered price’ consignments and the belief in the importance of port charges in route determination (see table 2 for summary of major conclusions).

Key concepts: Port (circuit theory), Competition (biology), Perception, Preference, Service (business), Business, Agency (philosophy), Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Freight forwarders speak: the Perception of Route Competition via Seaports in the European Communities Research Project.Part 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens