Comparisons of light water reactor pellet transient thermal response with FRAP-T4 predictions during reactor shutdown events under normal cooling conditions. [PWR; BWR]
G.B. Peeler, Dennis R. Coleman
Abstract
Open-access reader
G.B. Peeler, Dennis R. Coleman
Abstract
Open-access reader
Thermal response calculations performed with the transient fuel rod analysis program, FRAP-T4, are independently evaluated. FRAP-T4 predictions of fuel centerline initial temperature, thermal decay constant, and equilibrium temperature are compared with fuel pellet temperature data taken during reactor shutdown events. The contributions of fuel pellet effective conductivity and stored energy to the error in calculated thermal conditions is discussed. Conclusions are reached regarding existing model capabilities and further model development requirements.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Thermal response calculations performed with the transient fuel rod analysis program, FRAP-T4, are independently evaluated. FRAP-T4 predictions of fuel centerline initial temperature, thermal decay constant, and equilibrium temperature are compared with fuel pellet temperature data taken during reactor shutdown events. The contributions of fuel pellet effective conductivity and stored energy to the error in calculated thermal conditions is discussed. Conclusions are reached regarding existing model capabilities and further model development requirements.
Key concepts: Shutdown, Nuclear engineering, Transient (computer programming), Materials science, Transient analysis, Transient response, Pressurized water reactor, Water cooling