1990Nuclear TechnologyRequires access

Examining the Inherent Safety of Prism, Safr, and the Mhtgr

G.J. Van Tuyle, Peter G. Kroeger, G.C. Slovik, B.C. Chan, R.J. Kennett, A. Aronson

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Three advanced design concepts, including two liquid-metal-cooled reactors (LMRs), the Power Reactor Inherently Safe Module (PRISM) and the Sodium Advanced Fast Reactor (SAFR), and a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) are discussed and compared. Each provides inherent or passive safety to improve system safety. The focus is on two primary objectives: reactor shutdown and shutdown heat removal. The LMR and HTGR concepts rely on inherent reactivity feedback to provide an inherent reactor response under a failure-to-scram condition; SAFR also provides a passive shutdown system using Curie point magnets (the self-actuated scram system). For shutdown heat removal, the LMR and HTGR designs rely on passive air cooling of the reactor vessel as the ultimate safety-grade system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three advanced design concepts, including two liquid-metal-cooled reactors (LMRs), the Power Reactor Inherently Safe Module (PRISM) and the Sodium Advanced Fast Reactor (SAFR), and a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) are discussed and compared. Each provides inherent or passive safety to improve system safety. The focus is on two primary objectives: reactor shutdown and shutdown heat removal. The LMR and HTGR concepts rely on inherent reactivity feedback to provide an inherent reactor response under a failure-to-scram condition; SAFR also provides a passive shutdown system using Curie point magnets (the self-actuated scram system). For shutdown heat removal, the LMR and HTGR designs rely on passive air cooling of the reactor vessel as the ultimate safety-grade system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three advanced design concepts, including two liquid-metal-cooled reactors (LMRs), the Power Reactor Inherently Safe Module (PRISM) and the Sodium Advanced Fast Reactor (SAFR), and a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) are discussed and compared. Each provides inherent or passive safety to improve system safety. The focus is on two primary objectives: reactor shutdown and shutdown heat removal. The LMR and HTGR concepts rely on inherent reactivity feedback to provide an inherent reactor response under a failure-to-scram condition; SAFR also provides a passive shutdown system using Curie point magnets (the self-actuated scram system). For shutdown heat removal, the LMR and HTGR designs rely on passive air cooling of the reactor vessel as the ultimate safety-grade system.

Key concepts: Scram, Shutdown, Nuclear engineering, Decay heat, Inherent safety, Sodium-cooled fast reactor, Environmental science, Water cooling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Examining the Inherent Safety of Prism, Safr, and the Mhtgr — Research Paper | ScholarLens