1994Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of the Combat Vehicle Command and Control System. Operational Effectiveness of an Armor Battalion

Bruce C. Leibrecht, Glen A. Meade, Jeffrey H. Schmidt, William J. Doherty, Carl W. Lickteig

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In support of Army initiatives to meet future command, control, and communications (C3) challenges, the Combat Vehicle Command and Control (CVCC) research and development program evaluated automated C3 technology using soldier-in-the-loop simulation. The CVCC system includes a digital Position Navigation system, a digital Command and Control Display, the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer, and digital workstations in the Tactical Operations Center. The evaluation reported here compared the CVCC system with Baseline (conventional) capabilities in terms of a battalion's operational effectiveness. Using M-1 tank simulators in the Mounted Warfare Test Bed at Fort Knox, Kentucky, unit commanders and executive officers with crews were integrated with semiautomated vehicles under their control to form complete tank battalions. Each battalion completed three days of training, followed by a simulated combat test scenario. One of a series, this report documents improvements in the performance of unit and vehicle commanders by key Battlefield Operating Systems, along with lessons learned. Companion reports address training issues, soldier- machine interface findings, and performance from a tactical perspective. The collective findings help determine combat doctrine, materiel requirements, and training requirements for future automated C3 systems for mounted warfare.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In support of Army initiatives to meet future command, control, and communications (C3) challenges, the Combat Vehicle Command and Control (CVCC) research and development program evaluated automated C3 technology using soldier-in-the-loop simulation. The CVCC system includes a digital Position Navigation system, a digital Command and Control Display, the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer, and digital workstations in the Tactical Operations Center. The evaluation reported here compared the CVCC system with Baseline (conventional) capabilities in terms of a battalion's operational effectiveness. Using M-1 tank simulators in the Mounted Warfare Test Bed at Fort Knox, Kentucky, unit commanders and executive officers with crews were integrated with semiautomated vehicles under their control to form complete tank battalions. Each battalion completed three days of training, followed by a simulated combat test scenario. One of a series, this report documents improvements in the performance of unit and vehicle commanders by key Battlefield Operating Systems, along with lessons learned. Companion reports address training issues, soldier- machine interface findings, and performance from a tactical perspective. The collective findings help determine combat doctrine, materiel requirements, and training requirements for future automated C3 systems for mounted warfare.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In support of Army initiatives to meet future command, control, and communications (C3) challenges, the Combat Vehicle Command and Control (CVCC) research and development program evaluated automated C3 technology using soldier-in-the-loop simulation. The CVCC system includes a digital Position Navigation system, a digital Command and Control Display, the Commander's Independent Thermal Viewer, and digital workstations in the Tactical Operations Center. The evaluation reported here compared the CVCC system with Baseline (conventional) capabilities in terms of a battalion's operational effectiveness. Using M-1 tank simulators in the Mounted Warfare Test Bed at Fort Knox, Kentucky, unit commanders and executive officers with crews were integrated with semiautomated vehicles under their control to form complete tank battalions. Each battalion completed three days of training, followed by a simulated combat test scenario. One of a series, this report documents improvements in the performance of unit and vehicle commanders by key Battlefield Operating Systems, along with lessons learned. Companion reports address training issues, soldier- machine interface findings, and performance from a tactical perspective. The collective findings help determine combat doctrine, materiel requirements, and training requirements for future automated C3 systems for mounted warfare.

Key concepts: Armour, Aeronautics, Command and control, Control (management), Computer science, Engineering, Operations research, Marine engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Combat Vehicle Command and Control System. Operational Effectiveness of an Armor Battalion — Research Paper | ScholarLens