Life Cycle Comparison of Steel and GFRP Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Designs in the Context of Uncertainty
Paul N Christensen, G A Sparks, Gamil Tadros, Mike Lau, R Eden
Abstract
Paul N Christensen, G A Sparks, Gamil Tadros, Mike Lau, R Eden
Abstract
Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.
Key concepts: Deck, Fibre-reinforced plastic, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory), Context (archaeology), Service life, Reinforced concrete, Engineering