20082008 Concrete Bridge ConferenceFederal Highway AdministrationNational Concrete Bridge CouncilMissouri Department of TransportationAmerican Concrete Institute (ACI)Requires access

Life Cycle Comparison of Steel and GFRP Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Designs in the Context of Uncertainty

Paul N Christensen, G A Sparks, Gamil Tadros, Mike Lau, R Eden

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four competing bridge deck designs are compared on the basis of life cycle costs (LCC). Two of the designs are reinforced with steel. The remaining two are reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP). Typical of Canadian prairie environments, the decks will face periodic exposure to deicing salts – a factor influencing both the designs and projected maintenance needs. Combining the resulting stream of costs over a 100-year service life and required rate of discount permits the computation of Present Worth LCC (PWLCC) for comparative purposes. Uncertainty in performance and other variables is captured through a systematic integration of sensitivity and risk analyses to produce expected value results and corresponding risk profiles. The results will aid the Manitoba Department of Infrastructure and Transportation select deck designs for two upcoming bridge projects.

Key concepts: Deck, Fibre-reinforced plastic, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory), Context (archaeology), Service life, Reinforced concrete, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Life Cycle Comparison of Steel and GFRP Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck Designs in the Context of Uncertainty — Research Paper | ScholarLens