2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of backcalculation layer moduli on three-layer flexible pavement system

Bagus Hario Setiadji, T. F. Fwa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 1943, Burmister introduced an analytical solution to overcome a practical problem in designing an economical pavement with sufficient thickness over a subgrade to provide adequate support for traffic load. Using this solution, a backcalculation algorithm can be developed to obtain the layer elastic moduli. Making use of hypothetical data, this paper evaluates the choice of the optimum configuration of deflection measurements for backcalculating the layer elastic moduli of a flexible pavement system consisted of three layers, i.e. surface layer, subbase layer and subgrade. Two computer programs (FPAVE3 based on closed-form backcalculation algorithm; and EVERCALC based on iterative trial and error backcalculation algorithm) were evaluated based on two types of deflections, exact and random deflections. The assessment of the optimum deflection selection was conducted by comparing the discrepancies between the computed elastic moduli against their true moduli and analyzing the dispersion of the computed moduli calculated based on random deflection. The results showed that the deflection sensors near the load could better estimate the layer moduli, especially for elastic moduli of surface and subbase layer. On the other hand, the estimation of elastic modulus of subgrade is not much dependent on the choice of deflection sensor configuration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1943, Burmister introduced an analytical solution to overcome a practical problem in designing an economical pavement with sufficient thickness over a subgrade to provide adequate support for traffic load. Using this solution, a backcalculation algorithm can be developed to obtain the layer elastic moduli. Making use of hypothetical data, this paper evaluates the choice of the optimum configuration of deflection measurements for backcalculating the layer elastic moduli of a flexible pavement system consisted of three layers, i.e. surface layer, subbase layer and subgrade. Two computer programs (FPAVE3 based on closed-form backcalculation algorithm; and EVERCALC based on iterative trial and error backcalculation algorithm) were evaluated based on two types of deflections, exact and random deflections. The assessment of the optimum deflection selection was conducted by comparing the discrepancies between the computed elastic moduli against their true moduli and analyzing the dispersion of the computed moduli calculated based on random deflection. The results showed that the deflection sensors near the load could better estimate the layer moduli, especially for elastic moduli of surface and subbase layer. On the other hand, the estimation of elastic modulus of subgrade is not much dependent on the choice of deflection sensor configuration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1943, Burmister introduced an analytical solution to overcome a practical problem in designing an economical pavement with sufficient thickness over a subgrade to provide adequate support for traffic load. Using this solution, a backcalculation algorithm can be developed to obtain the layer elastic moduli. Making use of hypothetical data, this paper evaluates the choice of the optimum configuration of deflection measurements for backcalculating the layer elastic moduli of a flexible pavement system consisted of three layers, i.e. surface layer, subbase layer and subgrade. Two computer programs (FPAVE3 based on closed-form backcalculation algorithm; and EVERCALC based on iterative trial and error backcalculation algorithm) were evaluated based on two types of deflections, exact and random deflections. The assessment of the optimum deflection selection was conducted by comparing the discrepancies between the computed elastic moduli against their true moduli and analyzing the dispersion of the computed moduli calculated based on random deflection. The results showed that the deflection sensors near the load could better estimate the layer moduli, especially for elastic moduli of surface and subbase layer. On the other hand, the estimation of elastic modulus of subgrade is not much dependent on the choice of deflection sensor configuration.

Key concepts: Subgrade, Moduli, Deflection (physics), Elastic modulus, Materials science, Structural engineering, Mathematics, Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of backcalculation layer moduli on three-layer flexible pavement system — Research Paper | ScholarLens