1956•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Tucker v. Lombardo [DISSENT]

Jesse W. Carter

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

No prejudicial error existed when the jury instructions correctly informed the jury about the shooter's degree of care in firing a gun on a skeet range and informed the jury about contributory negligence and assumption of the risk.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No prejudicial error existed when the jury instructions correctly informed the jury about the shooter's degree of care in firing a gun on a skeet range and informed the jury about contributory negligence and assumption of the risk.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No prejudicial error existed when the jury instructions correctly informed the jury about the shooter's degree of care in firing a gun on a skeet range and informed the jury about contributory negligence and assumption of the risk.

Key concepts: Dissent, Political science, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tucker v. Lombardo [DISSENT] — Research Paper | ScholarLens